2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagined territories and histories in conflict during the struggles for Western Sahara, 1956–1979

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This demonstrates how research rooted in postcolonial studies not only historicises the contemporary legacies of colonial control and the imperial cultural imaginary but also makes room for diverse spaces and voices in critical military geographies to shape understandings of the ways in which military processes are situated, socially constituted, and diverse (Rech et al, ). Examples of this work ranges from the ways in which post‐independence territorial conceptions and conflicts were framed (Campos‐Serrano & Rodriguez‐Esteban, ), how military science shaped traditions of and challenges to national identity (Capello, ), how cities were an entangled hybrid of colonial and indigenous planning and use (Bigon & Hart, ), and how narratives challenge the occlusions of narrow military histories of liberation history (McGregor, ). This diverse, but in no way exhaustive, list of the ways through which postcolonial geographies has challenged critical military studies to extend the temporalities and spatialities of military processes to be included in the natures and legacies of military geographies.…”
Section: Legacies: Historical Geography and A Military Genealogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates how research rooted in postcolonial studies not only historicises the contemporary legacies of colonial control and the imperial cultural imaginary but also makes room for diverse spaces and voices in critical military geographies to shape understandings of the ways in which military processes are situated, socially constituted, and diverse (Rech et al, ). Examples of this work ranges from the ways in which post‐independence territorial conceptions and conflicts were framed (Campos‐Serrano & Rodriguez‐Esteban, ), how military science shaped traditions of and challenges to national identity (Capello, ), how cities were an entangled hybrid of colonial and indigenous planning and use (Bigon & Hart, ), and how narratives challenge the occlusions of narrow military histories of liberation history (McGregor, ). This diverse, but in no way exhaustive, list of the ways through which postcolonial geographies has challenged critical military studies to extend the temporalities and spatialities of military processes to be included in the natures and legacies of military geographies.…”
Section: Legacies: Historical Geography and A Military Genealogymentioning
confidence: 99%