2020
DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2020.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging assessment after SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six cases of radiation-induced TLS in solid tumor malignancies have previously been described. 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 The details of these cases are summarized in Table 2 . All patients received radiation alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six cases of radiation-induced TLS in solid tumor malignancies have previously been described. 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 The details of these cases are summarized in Table 2 . All patients received radiation alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, if the two lesions are close to each other, the first treatment operation (especially if the SBRT is carried out first) may change the location, shape, and texture of the lesions, thus increasing the difficulty of the later treatment. High doses of radiation stimulation from SBRT treatment cause some degree of reactive hyperemia, hepatic cell loss, hyperplasia, or parenchymal fibrosis [ 33 ]. However, unexpectedly, our novel RFA and SBRT treatment exhibited no adverse grade 3+ events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adverse effects were comparable with or even lower than those of using RFA or SBRT alone (reported adverse events of grade 3+ for RFA or SBRT treatment alone are 2.6–11% and 1.6–5%, respectively [ 12 , 18 , 20 ]). Radiological examinations were performed every three months in the first year of follow-up, every three to six months in the second year, and every 6 − 12 months in the subsequent years depending on the clinical needs [ 33 ]. Notably, because of reactive hyperemia by high-dose radiation stimulation, AP hyperenhancement can occur after SBRT in successfully treated HCCs and may not represent a viable residual tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiological examinations were performed every three months in the rst year of follow-up, every 3-6 months in the second year, and every 6-12 months in the subsequent years depending on the clinical needs [30]. Notably, because of reactive hyperemia by high-dose radiation stimulation, AP hyperenhancement can occur after SBRT in successfully treated HCCs and may not represent residual viable tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%