2019
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
297
0
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
297
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…They emphasized that the presence and severity of clinical events were significantly associated with thrombosis and cap inflammation in ruptured plaques. Several features of carotid plaque vulnerability detected by imaging techniques could predict the risk of stroke occurrence and could be useful for stroke risk stratification, including intraplaque hemorrhage, lipid-rich necrotic core, thin or ruptured fibrous cap, plaque inflammation, intraplaque neovascularization, plaque volume, and irregular morphology of the luminal surface 8. However, vessel wall imaging techniques, such as HR-MRI VWI and intravascular ultrasound, may miss subtle lesions with resolutions in the millimeter range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They emphasized that the presence and severity of clinical events were significantly associated with thrombosis and cap inflammation in ruptured plaques. Several features of carotid plaque vulnerability detected by imaging techniques could predict the risk of stroke occurrence and could be useful for stroke risk stratification, including intraplaque hemorrhage, lipid-rich necrotic core, thin or ruptured fibrous cap, plaque inflammation, intraplaque neovascularization, plaque volume, and irregular morphology of the luminal surface 8. However, vessel wall imaging techniques, such as HR-MRI VWI and intravascular ultrasound, may miss subtle lesions with resolutions in the millimeter range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of angioplasty and stenting based on the stenosis diameter in the intracranial artery is unclear 4–7. A previous study showed that the stroke recurrence risk is associated with features of vulnerable plaque rather than the diameter of the stenosis 8. Plaque vulnerability characteristics combined with a degree of stenosis may help in the selection of high-risk patients for medical therapy and necessary revascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers to identify plaques at higher risk of ipsilateral stroke have been proposed with different imaging modalities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) (Aboyans et al, 2017;Naylor et al, 2018;Saba et al, 2019). These biomarkers are based on comparisons with the histological profiles of vulnerable plaques, determined by the presence of a ruptured fibrous cap or an intra-plaque hemorrhage for instance (Lovett et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional concept of using the degree of luminal stenosis as the sole imaging marker for the selection of the optimal therapeutic approach is challenged by a rapidly growing body of literature demonstrating that plaques causing only mild stenosis may still lead to stroke. 6,7 Moreover, it is important to underline that plaque composition may change dramatically over a few years and cardiovascular risk factors play a major role in these changes. 8 Physicians treating patients with carotid disease should be aware of this paradigm shift since nowadays the imaging of vulnerable plaques and their characterization plays a key role towards the improvement of risk strat-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%