2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3486-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging differentiation of phytobezoar and small-bowel faeces: CT characteristics with quantitative analysis in patients with small- bowel obstruction

Abstract: • MDCT examination helps to differentiate phytobezoar and small-bowel faeces. • A higher grade of obstruction is commonly associated with phytobezoar impaction. • Mesenteric fatty stranding and intraperitoneal fluid are frequently associated with small-bowel faeces. • Quantitative measurement of the obstructed bowel adds the diagnostic accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] Chen et al . [12] showed that a higher grade of obstruction is commonly associated with phytobezoar impaction without mesenteric fatty stranding and intraperitoneal fluid; moreover, they found that a combination of the food debris length <9.5 cm and the mean attenuation value <11.75 HU of the obstructed bowel at the transition point was suggestive for phytobezoar, such as in our patient. Although these features are typically found in the small bowel, they may also be considered very useful in the large bowel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…[11] Chen et al . [12] showed that a higher grade of obstruction is commonly associated with phytobezoar impaction without mesenteric fatty stranding and intraperitoneal fluid; moreover, they found that a combination of the food debris length <9.5 cm and the mean attenuation value <11.75 HU of the obstructed bowel at the transition point was suggestive for phytobezoar, such as in our patient. Although these features are typically found in the small bowel, they may also be considered very useful in the large bowel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, there is no consensus on the diagnostic value of these CT findings [6,[8][9][10][11][12]26,27]. In addition, findings of feces sign and intraperitoneal free fluid had many different etiologies such as malignity, metabolic causes and cirrhosis [11,26,28]. Thus lead to decrease in sensitivity and specificity of this CT signs in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In this study, most patients ( n = 49) showed an obstruction located at the ileum, which is consistent with the findings of most reports [ 7 ]. The reason may be related to the narrowing of the ileal lumen or the reduction of water content in the ileum [ 8 , 9 ]. When the small intestine is obstructed, owing to the inability of the intestinal contents to be discharged properly, gas and fluid accumulation occurs, leading to increased pressure of the intestinal cavity, expansion and congestion of the intestinal wall, intestinal mucosal ischemia and necrosis, and changes in intestinal flora structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%