2017
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging findings of flexion type of hangman's fracture; an attempt for a more objective evaluation with newly introduced scoring system

Abstract: Objective: To identify the flexion type of hangman's fracture on imaging studies. Methods: 38 cases of hangman's fracture were retrospectively studied and categorized into flexion and nonflexion groups. Plain radiograph, CT and MRI of these patients were evaluated; 13 radiological parameters that might define flexion injuries were measured. The data were statistically analyzed to identify good criteria and to rank them according to their importance in predicting flexion.Results: Seven radiological criteria tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also use the C3 body chip fracture at the antero-rostral body and the kyphosis of the C2–3 junction as the indicators for the flexion injuries. The present authors do not support this view entirely but use additional radiological parameters, particularly evidence of tensile failure of the PLC at C1–2 as evidence of flexion type of Hangman’s injury [40,41]. The criteria for diagnosis of the flexion injury are illustrated in earlier publications by the author.…”
Section: Clinical Relevance To Hangman’s Injuries Of the Cervical Spinementioning
confidence: 86%
“…They also use the C3 body chip fracture at the antero-rostral body and the kyphosis of the C2–3 junction as the indicators for the flexion injuries. The present authors do not support this view entirely but use additional radiological parameters, particularly evidence of tensile failure of the PLC at C1–2 as evidence of flexion type of Hangman’s injury [40,41]. The criteria for diagnosis of the flexion injury are illustrated in earlier publications by the author.…”
Section: Clinical Relevance To Hangman’s Injuries Of the Cervical Spinementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients were medically confirmed of Hangman’s fractures, which were defined as axis ring fractures with or without displacement and/or angulation at C2/3 level [ 1 , 3 , 10 , 12 ]; (2) patients with complete imaging studies, including X-rays, axial plane CT scans, sagittal and coronal plane reconstructions, and three-dimensional reconstructions of cervical spine, and all CT images were acquired using at least a 64-slice multidetector CT scanner [ 16 ]. Patients with congenital anomalies, infections, or tumors in the upper cervical spine were excluded [ 7 , 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were included if they ful lled all the 2 criteria: (1) patients were medically con rmed of axis ring fractures with bilateral fracture lines through any part of the bony ring, including pediculoisthmic component (PIC) fractures, posterior wall of vertebral body fractures, superior or inferior articular facets, or lamina [14,15]; (2) patients with complete imaging studies, including X-rays, axial plane computed tomography (CT) scans, sagittal and coronal plane reconstructions, and three-dimensional reconstructions of cervical spine, and all CT images were acquired using at least a 64-slice multidetector CT scanner [5]. Patients with congenital anomalies, infections, or tumors in the upper cervical spine were excluded [13,16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%