2013
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging improvement by prestack signal enhancement

Abstract: The quality of recorded seismic data depends on many factors and a low signal‐to‐noise ratio leads to a low quality of processing and imaging. The zero‐offset common‐reflection‐surface stack and multifocusing methods have been successfully applied to improve the prestack signal‐to‐noise ratio by the partial summation of coherent seismic events. However, in the case of non‐hyperbolic traveltime behaviour of seismic events these approaches can result in non‐optimal partial summation. We develop a local common‐of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, MF can be considered as a method for wavefield analysis, which reliably estimates wavefront parameters of each seismic event at each imaging point (Hubral, 1983; Landa et al., 1999). These attributes have broad applications in seismic imaging and interpretation (Berkovitch et al., 2012; Buzlukov & Landa, 2013; Chang, Hu, et al., 2019; Elhaj et al., 2014; Landa et al., 2009, 2013; Schoepp et al., 2015).…”
Section: Review Of Multifocusing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, MF can be considered as a method for wavefield analysis, which reliably estimates wavefront parameters of each seismic event at each imaging point (Hubral, 1983; Landa et al., 1999). These attributes have broad applications in seismic imaging and interpretation (Berkovitch et al., 2012; Buzlukov & Landa, 2013; Chang, Hu, et al., 2019; Elhaj et al., 2014; Landa et al., 2009, 2013; Schoepp et al., 2015).…”
Section: Review Of Multifocusing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more sophisticated approach called nonlinear beam forming (NLBF) is based on estimation of actual local moveout directly from the data followed by stacking along estimated trajectories . NLBF consists of two steps: estimation of the unknown coefficients (prestack kinematic attributes) using semblance optimization and weighted summation of seismic events along the estimated surfaces similar to CRS or multifocusing techniques (Baykulov and Gajewski, 2009;Berkovitch et al, 2011;Buzlukov and Landa, 2013). In this study we demonstrate supergrouping and nonlinear beamforming on synthetic and challenging land seismic data from the Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Imaging structural complexities in the near surface (top 1 km) of the Carosue Basin are of critical importance for exploration and, consequently, time imaging has to be replaced by depth imaging techniques to accommodate for the lateral velocity variations of the subsurface (Buzlukov & Landa, 2013). Lateral velocity variations are often associated with complex geology and the depth migration algorithm has the ability to accommodate such features, including steep dips (Yilmaz, 2001).…”
Section: Seismic Data Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%