2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging individuals with obesity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it could be confirmed that IR is superior to FBP, and there is a demonstrable improvement in image quality. Using IR, especially in obese patients, to maintain image quality at reduced radiation doses was described previously 53,54 and allowed for a 30% to 60% dose reduction in a recent study. 55 This is not surprising and reflects the general experience with these reconstruction procedures, but again emphasizes the importance of broad use of IR.…”
Section: †Anovamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it could be confirmed that IR is superior to FBP, and there is a demonstrable improvement in image quality. Using IR, especially in obese patients, to maintain image quality at reduced radiation doses was described previously 53,54 and allowed for a 30% to 60% dose reduction in a recent study. 55 This is not surprising and reflects the general experience with these reconstruction procedures, but again emphasizes the importance of broad use of IR.…”
Section: †Anovamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the size of each fat depot in clinical settings remains a challenge. The most precise tools are computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which are time consuming, costly and, in the case of CT, require radiation [8 ▪ ,9]. These reasons justify the use by clinicians of less precise, but more accommodating tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%