2016
DOI: 10.3791/53566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Membrane Potential with Two Types of Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Voltage Sensors

Abstract: Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) have improved to the point where they are beginning to be useful for in vivo recordings. While the ultimate goal is to image neuronal activity in vivo, one must be able to image activity of a single cell to ensure successful in vivo preparations. This procedure will describe how to image membrane potential in a single cell to provide a foundation to eventually image in vivo. Here we describe methods for imaging GEVIs consisting of a voltage-sensing domain fused to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with two similarly bright FPs) have the advantage that the ratio removes common mode noise due to movement, e.g., respiration and blood flow. However, the fluorescent intensities of the donor and acceptor FPs are often different, which means the shot noise of the ratio will be higher than that of either individual signal [35, 36]. FRET quenching microbial rhodopsin signals are not ratiometric because there is only a single optical signal (from the fluorescent donor).…”
Section: Signal Characteristics Of 11 Different Gevismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with two similarly bright FPs) have the advantage that the ratio removes common mode noise due to movement, e.g., respiration and blood flow. However, the fluorescent intensities of the donor and acceptor FPs are often different, which means the shot noise of the ratio will be higher than that of either individual signal [35, 36]. FRET quenching microbial rhodopsin signals are not ratiometric because there is only a single optical signal (from the fluorescent donor).…”
Section: Signal Characteristics Of 11 Different Gevismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rhodopsin-based GEVIs exhibit a near-linear voltage response ( 9 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 22 ). Other GEVIs exhibit a sigmoidal fluorescence change as a function of voltage ( 4 , 6 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ). A linear slope will spread the dynamic fluorescence change over a broad voltage range.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of this is shown in Figure 2 . The HEK cell in Figure 2 is expressing a GEVI from which the ΔF and the ΔF/F traces from three different light levels are shown (Lee et al, 2016 ). As can be seen from this comparison, a high ΔF/F value can be achieved by a large change in fluorescence or a small change in fluorescence when the probe is dim.…”
Section: A Brief Description Of Currently Available Gevismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Varying light levels affect ΔF and ΔF/F values. (A) An HEK 293 cell expressing a single fluorescent protein (FP) based GEVI, Bongwoori, is shown in resting light intensity (RLI), (B) the fluorescence traces of averaged ΔF (F x -F 0 ) values from three different regions with varying intensity, (C) the fluorescence traces showing averaged ΔF/F values from the same regions in ( B ; modified with permission from Lee et al, 2016 , Figure 6). …”
Section: A Brief Description Of Currently Available Gevismentioning
confidence: 99%