Imaging of colorectal cancer liver metastases using contrast-enhanced US, multidetector CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Imaging of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has improved in recent years. Therefore, the role of current imaging techniques needs to be defined. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the detection of CRCLMs. Material and Methods PubMed database was searched for articles published during 2000–2019. Inclusion criteria were as follows: diagnosis/suspicion of CRCLMs; CEUS, MDCT, MRI, or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of CRCLMs; prospective study design; histopathologic examination, intraoperative findings and/or follow-up used as reference standard; and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. Results Twelve prospective studies were assessed, including 536 patients with CRCLMs (n = 1335). On a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity of CEUS, MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT was 86%, 84%, 89%, and 62%, respectively. MRI had the highest sensitivity on a per-lesion analysis. CEUS and MDCT had comparable sensitivities. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS, MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT was 80% and 97%, 87% and 95%, 87% and 94%, and 96% and 97%, respectively. The per-patient sensitivities for MRI and MDCT were similar. The sensitivity for MRI was higher than that for CEUS, MDCT, and FDG PET/CT for lesions <10 mm and lesions at least 10 mm in size. Hepatospecific contrast agent did not improve diagnostic performances. Conclusion MRI is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating CRCLMs. Both MDCT and CEUS can be used as alternatives.

Role of metabolic Positron Emission Tomography parameters in liver metastasis from Colon and rectal Cancer.

“…Quantitative PET parameters 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a sensitive technique in the detection of liver metastases from colon cancer, its sensitivity was reported to be 84% for lesions more than 10mm while only 16% for lesions less than 10mm. However, in compareson to MRI and CT, PET had lower sensitivity, but a higher specificity (30).…”

High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of liver metastasis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report and literature review

“…CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for diagnosing MLC. Liver metastasis often shows heterogeneous hypodense lesions with progressive concentric enhancement in CT scans, with a sensitivity of up to 97%[ 18 ], while the MRI technique can detect smaller lesions[ 18 , 19 ]. These two imaging modalities are not used in real-time evaluation, and their scanning durations are longer.…”

Deep Learning in Laparoscopic Colorectal Carcinoma Surgery under Magnetic Resonance Imaging

“…In the evaluation of tumor T staging, the intracavitary ultrasound probe had certain advantages over MRI, CT, and other imaging techniques, but there were many interfering factors. It is difficult to repeat the examination, and the overall anatomical plane was not as intuitive as MRI and CT images [16,17]. Although CT was simple in operation, it was basically the same as MRI in the display of tumor staging.…”