2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of Coronary Artery Anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
3
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
59
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Myocardial bridging was not included in the prevalence calculation as it was excluded from most of the previous studies in the literature. Although our results are near to the results of von Ziegler et al [38] who reported a prevalence of 2.3% yet it is still high as compared to other studies [36,40]. The high prevalence in this study may be attributed to the greater advances in imaging that made it less invasive and easier to image CAs accurately our patient population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Myocardial bridging was not included in the prevalence calculation as it was excluded from most of the previous studies in the literature. Although our results are near to the results of von Ziegler et al [38] who reported a prevalence of 2.3% yet it is still high as compared to other studies [36,40]. The high prevalence in this study may be attributed to the greater advances in imaging that made it less invasive and easier to image CAs accurately our patient population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Over the last decade, the multislice tomographic imaging made dramatically breakthroughs, so much that the electrocardiography-gated multidetector coronary CT angiography has become the method of choice for evaluation of known or suspected ANOCOR (Sundaram et al, 2010). Tomographic reconstructed images provide useful supplemental information with volumetric views allowing an analysis of ANOCOR in 3-D spatial orientation (Gharib et al, 2008, Manghat et al, 2005.…”
Section: Non-invasive Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, CAAs are classified either anatomically or clinically (19)(20)(21). The most accepted anatomic classification system was proposed by Angelini et al (19) who divided CAAs into anomalies of origination and course, anomalies of intrinsic coronary arterial anatomy and anomalies of coronary termination.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators overrated clinical importance of CAAs and classified them as hemodynamically significant (malignant) and hemodynamically insignificant (benign) (21). Thus, different investigators who used various CAA classification schemes are one of the main factors about different CAA incidence results of CCA studies (20). So, an accepted consensus in the literature about CAA classification system is needed.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation