2018
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of Spondylodiscitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
77
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
77
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Vertebral endplate destruction is typical for spondylodiscitis [21][22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30]. However, in this study, endplates in MT1, and early and advanced spondylodiscitis were found to be normal in up to 10.2%, 18.2%, and 5.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Vertebral endplate destruction is typical for spondylodiscitis [21][22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30]. However, in this study, endplates in MT1, and early and advanced spondylodiscitis were found to be normal in up to 10.2%, 18.2%, and 5.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…This is supported by several studies that have shown 18 F-FDG PET/CT to be at least equivalent to MRI in diagnosing spondylodiscitis and may be used as a means of monitoring the response to treatment [ 33 37 ]. In the absence of PET/CT facilities, other nuclear medicine modalities including 99m Tc-MDP bone scan and Gallium scan (particularly when combined with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT) have also been shown to be viable alternatives for the detection of spondylodiscitis [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to coarctation of the aorta, this results in dilatation of the ascending aorta, which is unlikely to cause compressive erosion of the vertebral bodies. Also it leads to "notching of the ribs" as the result of the collateral circulation, a condition which was not obeserved in the CT scan images (Figure 3c) [3] A chronic abscess would result in a "ragged" appearance of the anterior walls of the vertebral bodies, whereas in this case the margins are smooth [4] (Figure 3d Although there is evidence of structures within the cavity these are unrecognizable as specific anatomical entities, therefore a retrospective diagnosis concerning the type of cystic lesion and its composition is impossible. Due to the absence of an association with the neural tube, any cause within the spinal canal (such as purely neural tumors -e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%