2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of toxocariasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Definite diagnosis and subsequent treatment of OLM is difficult to be made as identification of larvae has been rarely done ( 11 ). Ocular form of toxocariasis is usually diagnosed by clinical finding on ophthalmologic examinations by ophthalmologist ( 12 ). Therefore, its detection can be challenging, because both the condition is relatively uncommon and its presentation varies from patient to patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definite diagnosis and subsequent treatment of OLM is difficult to be made as identification of larvae has been rarely done ( 11 ). Ocular form of toxocariasis is usually diagnosed by clinical finding on ophthalmologic examinations by ophthalmologist ( 12 ). Therefore, its detection can be challenging, because both the condition is relatively uncommon and its presentation varies from patient to patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the slow movement of the lesions, the disease is known as visceral larva migrans. In CT or MR imaging, hepatic lesions are observed as multiple ill-defined oval lesions that measure 1.0-1.5 cm in diameter [65]. Sometimes, they may be angular or trapezoidal.…”
Section: Toxocariasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a quantitative clinical scoring system, as described in randomized studies [85,86], is helpful for statistical evaluations of the evolution of the clinical picture. Abnormal patterns that can be detected on imaging techniques in organs or tissues [132] may be considered along with clinical signs in the assessment of treatment efficacy. However, great variability exists in the post-treatment evolution of these imaging abnormalities.…”
Section: Drug Of Choice Treatment Regimens and Therapeutic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%