2010 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ist.2010.5548544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging performance of a high resolution CMOS sensor under Mammographic and Radiographic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the linearized DQE curves are overestimated by 158.6 % at 28.7 µGy and 9.2 % at 306.0 µGy. A similar behaviour is observed in Michail et al (2010 and2011) the already converted image with the same SNR ratio as before. This leads to higher signal compared to noise, i.e.…”
Section: The Effect Of Nonlinearity On the Dqesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the linearized DQE curves are overestimated by 158.6 % at 28.7 µGy and 9.2 % at 306.0 µGy. A similar behaviour is observed in Michail et al (2010 and2011) the already converted image with the same SNR ratio as before. This leads to higher signal compared to noise, i.e.…”
Section: The Effect Of Nonlinearity On the Dqesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, since Φ is just the product of the fluence per exposure times exposure, a number of relative studies converted the output DN images to K a images based on the STP curve which is the plot of the output DN versus the input DAK level. In particular, they used linear regression model to fit the experimental data for DR systems (Ranger et al, 2007, Ghetti et al, 2008, Michail et al, 2010and Michail et al, 2011 or both linear and logarithmic regression models for DR and CR systems respectively (Monnin et al, 2005, Mackenzie and Honey, 2007, Marshall, 2007and Monnin et al, 2007. All these studies applied simple regression models without taking into account weighting factors or uncertainties on the measurements.…”
Section: The Effect Of Nonlinearity On the Dqementioning
confidence: 99%