2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector

Abstract: The investigation on test objects indicates that breast CT with a monochromatic SR source is technically feasible in terms of spatial resolution, image noise and contrast, for in vivo 3D imaging with a dose comparable to that of two-view mammography. Images obtained with the phase retrieval algorithm showed the best performance in the trade-off between spatial resolution and image noise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical dual-energy CT is typically performed using either dual-source [1], kVp switching [2][3][4], or dual-layered detectors [5,6]. More recently there has been development of pre-clinical systems which utilise energy discriminating photon counting detectors to provide up to eight channels of energy information [7][8][9][10]. The MARS (Medipix All Resolution System) is a spectral CT system based on the Medipix3RX photon counting detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical dual-energy CT is typically performed using either dual-source [1], kVp switching [2][3][4], or dual-layered detectors [5,6]. More recently there has been development of pre-clinical systems which utilise energy discriminating photon counting detectors to provide up to eight channels of energy information [7][8][9][10]. The MARS (Medipix All Resolution System) is a spectral CT system based on the Medipix3RX photon counting detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are implemented at higher photon energies compared to the mammography x-ray imaging (Bisogni et al 2007, Lindfors et al 2008, Zhao et al 2012, Sarno et al 2016, Ghani et al 2017, 2018. To successfully design and manufacture such phantoms the properties of the available printing materials need to be investigated.…”
Section: Danail Ivanovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our investigation, the sampling efficiency for the phase retrieved image was about 42% (10.6 lp/mm/25 lp/mm) as compared to the 62% efficiency for the phase sensitive image, a 32% reduction in sampling efficiency. Other single-distance phase retrieval methods have reported a reduction of more than 60% in their retrieved images as compared to phase sensitive images [52]. Thus, this retrieval method offers the advantage of offering the quantitative information while working with the polychromatic x-ray beams without greatly degrading the spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%