2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jb003930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging the colliding Indian and Asian lithospheric plates beneath Tibet

Abstract: A high‐resolution image of the base of the lithosphere from S‐to‐P converted seismic waves revealed the collision architecture of the Indian and Asian continental plates beneath the Tibetan Plateau. The base of the Indian lithosphere dips northward from a depth of 160 km beneath the Himalayas to a depth of 220 km just south of the Bangong suture. The base of the Asian lithosphere is nearly horizontal at the depth of 160–180 km from central to northern Tibet. There is a vertical gap of about 50 km between India… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
201
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
19
201
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant crustal shortening is accommodated by the subduction of the Indian lithosphere below the Tibetan lithosphere, as shown by numerous studies using receiver functions and tomographic methods , Wittlinger et al, 2004, Kumar et al, 2006, Li et al, 2008a. The Indian crust is probably separating from the mantle lithosphere and propagating as far as central Tibet at a shallow angle (Yuan et al 1997, Li et al, 2008aRoyden et al, 2008;Nabelek et al 2009;Zhang and Klempere, 2010), whereas the mantle lithosphere itself Wenchuan earthquake could not be well modeled with crustal deformation mechanism from only middle/lower crustal escape, and suggests that vertical force contribution to crustal deformation beneath Longmenshan and East Tibet could not be excluded (Zhang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resultant crustal shortening is accommodated by the subduction of the Indian lithosphere below the Tibetan lithosphere, as shown by numerous studies using receiver functions and tomographic methods , Wittlinger et al, 2004, Kumar et al, 2006, Li et al, 2008a. The Indian crust is probably separating from the mantle lithosphere and propagating as far as central Tibet at a shallow angle (Yuan et al 1997, Li et al, 2008aRoyden et al, 2008;Nabelek et al 2009;Zhang and Klempere, 2010), whereas the mantle lithosphere itself Wenchuan earthquake could not be well modeled with crustal deformation mechanism from only middle/lower crustal escape, and suggests that vertical force contribution to crustal deformation beneath Longmenshan and East Tibet could not be excluded (Zhang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsurface compensation may have occurred in a variety of different ways, such as by crustal thickening (Allegrè, 1984), denudation (Meng et al, 2006), slip partitioning (Chen et al, 1994;Tapponnier et al, 2001), subduction of the Indian mantle lithosphere (Kosarev et al, 1999;Kumar et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008a), lithospheric detachment (Houseman et al, 1981, Molnar, 1988, subduction of the Asian lithosphere (Willett and Beaumont, 1994;Kind et al, 2002) and eastward escape (Royden et al, 1997Clark and Royden, 2000;Klemperer, 2006). GPS displacement vectors (Gan et al, 2007) and SKS anisotropy measurements (Wang et al, 2008) indicate that the Tibetan crust (and possibly also the lithosphere and asthenosphere) is escaping eastwards, and that the main portion of the flow is being redirected towards the south east after it encounters the Sichuan Basin ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These locations of the LAB jumps seem to mark the location of the northernmost extension of the Indian lithosphere beneath Tibet along the west and central lines. The BNS was also determined as northern end of the Indian mantle lithosphere by the neighboring INDEPTH profile (23) [called east line in Fig. 1 (see also Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe here results from our two recent profiles and from other experiments (INDEPTH, 1991-1992 PASSCAL, Tien Shan and Karakoram) (22)(23)(24). We herein call our recent profiles the west and central lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Underthrusting of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Eurasian lithosphere has been proposed to be the main reason for the formation of the Himalayan and Karakorum ranges (Nelson et al, 1996;Kumar et al, 2006;Tseng et al, 2009) along with the formation of the central Tibetan region (Argand, 1924;Nelson et al, 1996;Li et al, 2008). The underlying reason for the development of the northern and eastern Tibetan Plateau, however, remains enigmatic (Karplus et al, 2011;Royden et al, 2008).…”
Section: Tectonics Of the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%