“…Many fundamental material excitations reside in the energy range of several 10 meV, e.g., phenomena related to phonons, excitons, plasmons, Landau level transitions, charge density waves, and magnons. Consequently, there is a strong desire to extend near-field nanospectroscopy toward the far-infrared and terahertz (THz) spectral range. ,, A successful approach to this goal has been combining scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) with infrared radiation from accelerator-based light sources. − ,,,− Specifically, synchrotron-based infrared near-field spectroscopy has pushed the spectral limit of nanospectroscopy down to ∼10 THz (320 cm –1 , 31 μm), thereby enabling many new experiments. ,− ,− Additionally, coming from lower frequencies (microwave regime), nanospectroscopy and nanoimaging around and below 1 THz is nowadays more frequently achieved, e.g., via THz time-domain spectroscopy and setups based on Schottky diodes or photoconductive antennas. − Despite such advances, the lack of suitable sources and matching detectors in the 1–10 THz rangethe so-called “THz gap” ,, has so far hampered extending broadband near-field nanospectroscopy into the center of this important spectral region. While examples of near-field nanospectroscopy and polariton interferometry in the 1–10 THz spectral range do exist, ,,,− such studies usually employ high-intensity narrowband laser sources to compensate for less-than-ideal detectors, thereby inducing limitations for spectroscopy.…”