2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34482-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imbalanced Cardiotocography Multi-classification for Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Using Weighted Random Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2017 ). However, many methods for learning unbalanced data with these ensembles have been developed (Chen and Breiman 2004 ). We modified the models to reduce the effect of skewed data, and generally improve the prediction results.…”
Section: Models and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2017 ). However, many methods for learning unbalanced data with these ensembles have been developed (Chen and Breiman 2004 ). We modified the models to reduce the effect of skewed data, and generally improve the prediction results.…”
Section: Models and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle the imbalanced data, the “class_weight” argument of the random forest algorithm was set to “balanced”, which penalises misclassification of the minority class (i.e. the positive samples) 21 . The remaining parameters of the random forest model were left to the default settings of the scikit-learn Python library (please refer to the “ Random forest settings ” section in the Methods) 22 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this experiment, we want to compare our proposed approach for learning from highly imbalanced data with methods that are already established in this field. For comparison, we used three methods: Balanced Random Forest (BRF) [ 74 ], EasyEnsamble (EE) [ 75 ], and Balanced Bagging (BB) [ 76 ]. BRF trains a classifier in which each tree of the forest will be provided balanced bootstrap samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%