2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.08042
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imbalanced Malware Images Classification: a CNN based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first category of papers referenced the challenge to either perform an abstract comparison or highlight the importance of machine learning for malware classification in industry, where the size of data is huge [43,19,28,47,18,38,49,44,25,53,46,21,4,57,16,17,39,50]. Papers in the second category performed partial or complete evaluation on the dataset to verify the effectiveness and/or efficiency of their proposed approach for various tasks.…”
Section: Citations Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category of papers referenced the challenge to either perform an abstract comparison or highlight the importance of machine learning for malware classification in industry, where the size of data is huge [43,19,28,47,18,38,49,44,25,53,46,21,4,57,16,17,39,50]. Papers in the second category performed partial or complete evaluation on the dataset to verify the effectiveness and/or efficiency of their proposed approach for various tasks.…”
Section: Citations Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then tested performance for different combinations of the training components. We considered mean squared error and smooth-L1 loss, which we weighted by class frequency to remove the bias introduced by the imbalance of the dataset 43 . In addition to the standard optimisation algorithm SGD, other optimisers such as Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam) 44 , Rectified Adam (RAdam) 45 and Adam with a corrected weight decay algorithm (AdamW) 46 were tested.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the test performance of the proposed models and others for Malimg dataset. Yue [24] uses a weighted loss function to handle im- 4 compares the test performance of the proposed models and others for BIG2015 dataset. Chen [30] and Khan et al [33] use transfer learning architectures for the dataset.…”
Section: Capsnetmentioning
confidence: 99%