2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMI – Oral biopharmaceutics tools project – Evaluation of bottom-up PBPK prediction success part 3: Identifying gaps in system parameters by analysing In Silico performance across different compound classes

Abstract: Three Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic software packages (GI-Sim, Simcyp® Simulator, and GastroPlus™) were evaluated as part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative Oral Biopharmaceutics Tools project (OrBiTo) during a blinded "bottom-up" anticipation of human pharmacokinetics. After data analysis of the predicted vs. measured pharmacokinetics parameters, it was found that oral bioavailability (F) was underpredicted for compounds with low permeability, suggesting improper estimates of intestinal surface are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PBPK modeling and simulation approaches have gained popularity in recent years, particularly for biopharmaceutical analysis of oral drug absorption, predicting the impact of drug-drug interactions, selecting an optimal dose and clinical trial design for pediatric applications, and for characterizing the impact of organ impairment. [3][4][5][6] PBPK models typically consist of 3 distinct components: (1) a drug-specific component characterizing the physicochemical properties of the drug, (2) a system-specific component characterizing the functioning of the underlying biological system, in this case the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and (3) a trial design component characterizing the impact of intrinsic (eg, demographics) and extrinsic factors (eg, drug-drug interactions) on the drug's pharmacokinetics (PK). As a result, PBPK models provide a platform for evaluating the combined impact of multiple factors, such as different formulations or differences in gastric pH, on a drug's PK and thus for in silico BE testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBPK modeling and simulation approaches have gained popularity in recent years, particularly for biopharmaceutical analysis of oral drug absorption, predicting the impact of drug-drug interactions, selecting an optimal dose and clinical trial design for pediatric applications, and for characterizing the impact of organ impairment. [3][4][5][6] PBPK models typically consist of 3 distinct components: (1) a drug-specific component characterizing the physicochemical properties of the drug, (2) a system-specific component characterizing the functioning of the underlying biological system, in this case the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and (3) a trial design component characterizing the impact of intrinsic (eg, demographics) and extrinsic factors (eg, drug-drug interactions) on the drug's pharmacokinetics (PK). As a result, PBPK models provide a platform for evaluating the combined impact of multiple factors, such as different formulations or differences in gastric pH, on a drug's PK and thus for in silico BE testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant information could be very useful in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Based on a series of recent publications from the OrBiTo project (39)(40)(41), prospective PBPK modeling of plasma profiles, after oral administration, using a bottom-up approaches is limited by the reliability of estimation of clearance and volume of distribution, quality of intestinal permeability data, quality of solubility data, and characterization of intestinal metabolism or transporter involvement. The development of methodologies for implementing BioGIT data into PBPK models and methodologies for the evaluation of processes taking place in the middle/lower small intestine using the BioGIT system as a basis would greatly improve PBPK modeling approaches and facilitate the development of orally administered drug products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed PBPK strategy herein for FIH pharmacokinetic predictions, based on a comprehensive review of recent literature and knowledge and best practices of experienced GastroPlus users, provides flow diagrams guiding through the layers of ADME complexities. Combining QSPR predictions with PBPK models from compound structure allows the assessment of risks based on compound type/properties [91], guides thinking and enables prioritisation of fit-for-purpose resources to support model development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%