2020
DOI: 10.3390/ph13120482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imidazole and Imidazolium Antibacterial Drugs Derived from Amino Acids

Abstract: The antibacterial activity of imidazole and imidazolium salts is highly dependent upon their lipophilicity, which can be tuned through the introduction of different hydrophobic substituents on the nitrogen atoms of the imidazole or imidazolium ring of the molecule. Taking this into consideration, we have synthesized and characterized a series of imidazole and imidazolium salts derived from L-valine and L-phenylalanine containing different hydrophobic groups and tested their antibacterial activity against two m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In sharp contrast, almost all imidazolium salts ( R 1 IR 2 ) exhibited a stronger antibacterial effect, including against ESBL-EC and MRSA ( p > 2.4). The antibacterial efficiency of R 1 IR 2 is quite similar to that of dehydroepiandrosterone-derived ( Hryniewicka et al, 2021 ), peptide-conjugated ( Reinhardt et al, 2014 ), ethoxyether-functionalized ( Huang et al, 2011 ), amino acid–derived ( Valls et al, 2020 ), polydiacetylene-conjugated ( Lee et al, 2016 ), and unsymmetrically substituted ( Çoban et al, 2017 ; Duman et al, 2019 ) imidazolium salts in previous reports. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity of imidazolium salts ( R 1 IR 2 ) increased following the substitution of methyl and bromobenzyl with dibromobenzyl groups and the change from one to two dibromobenzyl groups ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In sharp contrast, almost all imidazolium salts ( R 1 IR 2 ) exhibited a stronger antibacterial effect, including against ESBL-EC and MRSA ( p > 2.4). The antibacterial efficiency of R 1 IR 2 is quite similar to that of dehydroepiandrosterone-derived ( Hryniewicka et al, 2021 ), peptide-conjugated ( Reinhardt et al, 2014 ), ethoxyether-functionalized ( Huang et al, 2011 ), amino acid–derived ( Valls et al, 2020 ), polydiacetylene-conjugated ( Lee et al, 2016 ), and unsymmetrically substituted ( Çoban et al, 2017 ; Duman et al, 2019 ) imidazolium salts in previous reports. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity of imidazolium salts ( R 1 IR 2 ) increased following the substitution of methyl and bromobenzyl with dibromobenzyl groups and the change from one to two dibromobenzyl groups ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…compounds. [77] Although bis-cations have been reported to be more effective than the related mono-cation, other factors may affect and improve the antibacterial potency of the mono-cations.…”
Section: Effect Of Cation Number Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of these heterocyclic compounds, imidazole and its derivatives have a wide variety of biological activities. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Imidazole is an important group of heterocyclic compounds that are biologically active and of significant importance in medicinal chemistry. The imidazole ring is an important pharmacophore in modern drug discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%