2013
DOI: 10.21500/20112084.714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imitation and the developing social brain: infants’ somatotopic EEG patterns for acts of self and other

Abstract: A leading question in developmental social-cognitive neuroscience concerns the nature and function of neural links between action perception and production in early human development. Here we document a somatotopic pattern of activity of the sensorimotor EEG mu rhythm in 14-month-old infants. EEG was recorded during interactive trials in which infants activated a novel object using their own hands or feet (“execution” trials) and watched an experimenter use her hands or feet to achieve the same goal (“observat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The infant mu rhythm exhibited a degree of somatotopy, such that observation of hand actions was associated with greater mu desynchronization at lateral central electrode sites, and observation of foot actions was associated with greater desynchronization at the midline central electrode. A similar somatotopic pattern of mu rhythm desynchronization has been documented during infants’ own production of hand and foot actions (de Klerk, Johnson, & Southgate, ; Marshall, Saby, & Meltzoff, ). These findings are consistent with a much larger infant EEG literature suggesting an involvement of the sensorimotor system in action perception (for reviews, see Cuevas, Cannon, Yoo, & Fox, ; Marshall & Meltzoff, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The infant mu rhythm exhibited a degree of somatotopy, such that observation of hand actions was associated with greater mu desynchronization at lateral central electrode sites, and observation of foot actions was associated with greater desynchronization at the midline central electrode. A similar somatotopic pattern of mu rhythm desynchronization has been documented during infants’ own production of hand and foot actions (de Klerk, Johnson, & Southgate, ; Marshall, Saby, & Meltzoff, ). These findings are consistent with a much larger infant EEG literature suggesting an involvement of the sensorimotor system in action perception (for reviews, see Cuevas, Cannon, Yoo, & Fox, ; Marshall & Meltzoff, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Cz) when they performed foot actions (de Klerk, Johnson, & Southgate, ; Marshall, Saby, & Meltzoff, ). The mu rhythm was also found to show this response pattern when 14‐month‐old infants simply observed an experimenter performing hand and foot actions (Marshall et al., ; Saby, Meltzoff, & Marshall, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Infant mu activity is elicited during motion observation and execution (Fox et al, 2016). Marshall and colleagues have consistently found attenuated PSD of infant mu rhythm during infants’ execution and observation of body acts (Marshall, Saby, & Meltzoff, 2013; Marshall et al, 2011; see Marshall & Meltzoff, 2011, for review). The changes in the event-related mu activity has been referred to the “event-related desynchronization” (ERD) in these studies.…”
Section: Infant Eeg Oscillations and Other Cognitive Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%