Immanent obligations of response: articulating everyday response-abilities through care

Hofman, Lydia Baan

doi:10.1080/1600910x.2023.2222339

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At svare på mere end én måde. At skabe modtagelighed, at kere sig i praksis, kommer imidlertid ikke uden risiko (Baan Hofman, 2023;Moore, Dunne, Karels, og Hanlon, 2021). I den begivenhedsraekke jeg har undersøgt her, kunne det vaere risikoen for at have svigtet Theo ved ikke at svare hurtigere.…”

Section: At Forskningssvare Og Langstrakt Forskningsetikunclassified

Langstrakt etik

Kofoed

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Igennem en særlig affektiv og besværlig begivenhed afsøger jeg, hvad forsknings-etik også kan indebære. Begivenhedens elementer vedrører på forskellige måder digital mobning, og ligger år tilbage. Denne begivenhed fungerer i teksten som en prøvesten for, hvad forskningsetik kan være, når det ikke alene drejer sig om den akutte in situ etik. Teksten strækker sig igennem besværligheden i begivenheden, og vil fra første side handle, ikke alene om forskningsetik, men om de tidstråde, der forsinker svaret. Ved at afsøge begivenheden gennem læsning af Maria Tumarkin, Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, Astrid Schrader og Lauren Berlants tænkning, bliver det med års forsinkelse muligt at formulere artiklens bud: at forskningsetisk ansvar kan forstås som modtagelighed, og det overhovedet at give sig af med at svare, at forskningssvare. At svare-an kunne man sige, også selvom det sker med forsinkelse. Nøgleord: Forskningsetik, affekt, temporalitet, begivenhed, digital mobning, care

show abstract

Section: At Forskningssvare Og Langstrakt Forskningsetikunclassified

Langstrakt etik

Kofoed

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Positioning comfort measures in antenatal counselling for periviable infants

Carroll,

Thorvilson,

Collura

2024

Sociology Health & Illness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Caring for the extremely premature infant born in the grey zone of viability is the most difficult area of neonatal medicine. Little research has been done on antenatal communication between neonatologists and parents anticipating the birth of a periviable infant. This article analyses 25 antenatal consultations between neonatologists and parents in one Midwestern hospital in the United States of America. It explores how neonatologists position comfort care as one of two predominant care trajectories for extremely premature infants born into the grey zone of viability. We found comfort care featured minimally in and was often marginalised by neonatologists’ language. The two dominant discourses contributing to this were acute medicine’s life‐saving capacity and a limited temporal window marked by gestational age where comfort measures were deemed appropriate. Antenatal consultations framed by shared decision‐making could be approached as a form of care characterised by a relational openness and responsiveness to parents’ views on care. This asks neonatologists to enter antenatal consultations for periviability without knowing ahead of time which care trajectory will necessarily call one’s attention or the particular response one should take, thus highlighting the skills of reflexivity in addition to an attentiveness and openness towards those receiving care.

show abstract

Immanent obligations of response: articulating everyday response-abilities through care

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Langstrakt etik

Langstrakt etik

Positioning comfort measures in antenatal counselling for periviable infants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About