“…Freitas & Peña, 2006; Nakahara, Lamas, et al, 2019; Nakahara, Rodríguez‐Melgarejo, et al, 2022; Nakahara, Zacca, et al, 2018, 2019; Peña & Lamas, 2005; Willmott et al, 2019; Zacca et al, 2013; Zacca, Casagrande, et al, 2018; Zacca, Casagrande, Mielke, Huertas, Barbosa, Freitas, et al, 2020; Zacca, Casagrande, Mielke, Huertas, Espeland, Freitas, et al, 2020; Zacca, Paluch, et al, 2017), descriptions of life histories (e.g. Baine et al, 2019; Corahua‐Espinoza et al, 2023; Corahua‐Espinoza, Nakahara, Kabir, et al, 2022; Corahua‐Espinoza, Nakahara, Shellman, et al, 2022; Cosmo et al, 2014; Freitas, 2004, 2017, 2022; Freitas, Barbosa, & Carreira, 2021; Freitas, Barbosa, & Marín, 2016; Freitas, Carreira, Santos, & Barbosa, 2016; Freitas, Mota, Barbosa, & Carreira, 2019; Freitas, Rosa, et al, 2018; Freitas, Rosa, & Kaminski, 2021; Hurtado et al, 2021; Kaminski & Freitas, 2008; Nakahara, Hoffman, et al, 2020; See et al, 2018; Tejeira et al, 2021), and papers addressing the higher level phylogenetic relationships, using both morphology (Marín et al, 2017) and molecular (Espeland et al, 2019a; Murray & Prowell, 2005; Peña et al, 2010) datasets. These phylogenetic studies revealed a number of cases of generic paraphyly or polyphyly, implying the need for extensive revision of the generic classification.…”