2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00421.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate and delayed incorporations of events into dreams: further replication and implications for dream function

Abstract: SUMMAR Y The incorporation of memories into dreams is characterized by two types of temporal effects: the day-residue effect, involving immediate incorporations of events from the preceding day, and the dream-lag effect, involving incorporations delayed by about a week. This study was designed to replicate these two effects while controlling several prior methodological problems and to provide preliminary information about potential functions of delayed event incorporations. Introductory Psychology students we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
80
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is worth noting that in instances when daytime sources dated farther back in time to a current dream, in most cases, the memories of those events were refreshed on the day before the dreams occurred (e.g., there was talk about something that had happened some time ago). This result is consistent with the data on the high incorporation of immediate previousday events (about 65% of dreams) found in adult dreams (Epstein, 1985;Nielsen & Powell, 1992; see also Nielsen, Kuiken, Alain, Stenstrom, & Powell, 2004). This contrasts with Hobson's assertion that "When an experiental source of dream content could be identified at all (and often none could be found), the peak occurrence was six days before dream, Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 14:09 03 October 2015 not the day of the dream" (Hobson, 2013, p. 146), data for which there is no source cited.…”
Section: Is Freud's Dream Theory Obsolete?supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, it is worth noting that in instances when daytime sources dated farther back in time to a current dream, in most cases, the memories of those events were refreshed on the day before the dreams occurred (e.g., there was talk about something that had happened some time ago). This result is consistent with the data on the high incorporation of immediate previousday events (about 65% of dreams) found in adult dreams (Epstein, 1985;Nielsen & Powell, 1992; see also Nielsen, Kuiken, Alain, Stenstrom, & Powell, 2004). This contrasts with Hobson's assertion that "When an experiental source of dream content could be identified at all (and often none could be found), the peak occurrence was six days before dream, Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 14:09 03 October 2015 not the day of the dream" (Hobson, 2013, p. 146), data for which there is no source cited.…”
Section: Is Freud's Dream Theory Obsolete?supporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in keeping with both the day residue (Freud, 1900;Nielsen & Powell, 1992;Powell, Nielsen, Cheung, & Cervenka, 1995), and dream lag (Blagrove et al, 2011a(Blagrove et al, , 2011bNielsen, Kuiken, Alain, Stenstrom, & Powell, 2004) effects. Analyses in the present study illustrated the predominance of waking-life interpersonal relationships being represented in dreams, and to a lesser extent but still common waking-life concerns about work or studying, but financial worries in dreams were relatively rare.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The characteristic distribution of the results for the last week before the occurrence of the dream is consistent with the results of numerous studies (e.g., Nielsen & Powell, 1992;Marquardt et al, 1996;Nielsen et al, 2004). Such results can be linked to a common mistake that results from referring to an external week scale, a mistake that people frequently make when they try to arrange the time of previous events (Stawiska, 2000;after: Maruszewski 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%