2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate effects of a tibiofibular joint manipulation on lower extremity H-reflex measurements in individuals with chronic ankle instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
48
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it has been estimated that the reinjury rate following an inversion ankle sprain may be as high as 80%, suggesting the need to identify the most effective management strategies for this condition. 56 It has been suggested that patients with recurrent inversion ankle sprains frequently demonstrate dysfunction at the proximal tibiofibular, 3,31 distal tibiofibular, 34 talocrural, 17 or subtalar joint. 30 In addition, individuals with a history of an inversion ankle sprain may exhibit deficits in strength of the ankle inverters and increased sway with single-leg stance tested on a stable (eyes closed) or unstable surface.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, it has been estimated that the reinjury rate following an inversion ankle sprain may be as high as 80%, suggesting the need to identify the most effective management strategies for this condition. 56 It has been suggested that patients with recurrent inversion ankle sprains frequently demonstrate dysfunction at the proximal tibiofibular, 3,31 distal tibiofibular, 34 talocrural, 17 or subtalar joint. 30 In addition, individuals with a history of an inversion ankle sprain may exhibit deficits in strength of the ankle inverters and increased sway with single-leg stance tested on a stable (eyes closed) or unstable surface.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,50 The authors of these studies have suggested that this might be the result of altered mechanoreceptors following the ankle sprain, leading to a disrupted neural feedback system to the dynamic stabilizers of the ankle. Interestingly, Grindstaff et al 31 demonstrated that patients with chronic ankle instability who were treated with manipulation to the distal tibiofibular joint exhibited increased soleus activation. Perhaps manual therapy interventions stimulate mechanoreceptors and thereby assist the improvement of neural feedback, which may aid in dynamic stability and maximize the benefits of therapeutic exercise.…”
Section: Discussion Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,47,56 We have previously demonstrated that a distal tibiofibular joint manipulation results in an immediate increase in soleus motoneuron pool excitability. 26 Additionally, joint mobilization applied to the ankle has been shown to reduce pain and pressure pain threshold. 11,13,65 It is thought that ankle joint mobilization may alter afferent sensory input from the ankle, which may influence perception of pain and efferent motor output via a gating mechanism.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isto poderia explicar o aumento da instabilidade somente no eixo ântero-posterior, no presente estudo, já que a manipulação foi aplicada diretamente no tornozelo. Grindstaff et al (2011) observaram que a manipulação tíbio-társica distal produziu, de forma aguda, um aumento na ativação do músculo sóleo, porém, após 10-30 minutos, tanto para estes quanto para os músculos fibulares longos, houve diminuição de atividade. Beazell et al (2012) não observaram melhora, em indivíduos manipulados com relação a um grupo controle, tanto para a amplitude de movimento quanto para a função, em casos de instabilidade crônica do tornozelo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Contudo, técnicas de manipulação articular não estão totalmente embasadas na literatura (SILVA et al, 2012), e há de pobre à limitada evidência para o uso da manipulação em casos de entorses de tornozelo (BRANTINGHAM et al, 2012). Observa-se que a literatura ainda é pobre e com resultados conflitantes sobre o uso da manipulação em tornozelo (GRINDSTAFF et al, 2011;BEAZELL et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified