Immediate effects of whole-body vibration on neuromuscular performance of quadriceps and oscillation of the center of pressure: A randomized controlled trial

Borges, Daniel Tezoni; Macedo, Liane de Brito; Lins, Caio A.A.; Brasileiro, Jamilson Simões

doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.06.005

Cited by 10 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Immediate eff ects of whole-body vibration on neuromuscular performance of quadriceps and oscillation of the center of pressure: A randomized controlled trial DT Borges et al, 2016 To analyze the immediate eff ects of the body vibration with two diff erent frequencies on the neuromuscular performance of the quadriceps femoris and postural control in healthy individuals.…”

Section: Experimental Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Protocols of balance assessment using baropodometry in healthy individuals - systematic review

Machado

Barbosa

Oliveira

et al. 2021

SDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Experimental Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Protocols of balance assessment using baropodometry in healthy individuals - systematic review

Machado

Barbosa

Oliveira

et al. 2021

SDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Considering the acute effect, Annino et al (2017) also reported no alteration in the sEMG of the VL muscle when healthy individuals were exposed to 10 minutes of WBV at 35 Hz [59]. Borges et al (2016) evaluated the immediate effects of WBV in healthy individuals with frequencies of 30 and 50 Hz, and no significant differences in the value of RMS were found [60]. Considering the cumulative effect (Table 7), the present study found no significant changes in the electromyographic signal of the VL muscle in either leg.…”

Section: Effect Of Wbve On Semgmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Whole-Body Vibration Exercise on Neuromuscular Activation Through Electromyographic Pattern of Vastus Lateralis Muscle and on Range of Motion of Knees in Metabolic Syndrome: A Quasi-Randomized Cross-Over Controlled Trial

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is related to overweight and obesity, and contributes to clinical limitations. Exercise is used for the management of MetS individuals, who are often not motivated to perform this practice. Whole body vibration exercise (WBVE) produces several biological effects, besides being safe, effective, and feasible for MetS individuals. This pseudo-randomized and cross-over controlled trial study aimed to analyze the effects of WBVE on MetS individuals’ neuromuscular activation using the surface electromyography (sEMG) pattern (root mean square (RMS)) of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle and on the range of motion (ROM) of the knees. Participants (n = 39) were allocated to two groups: the treatment group (TG), which was exposed to WBVE, and the control group (CG). WBVE interventions were performed twice a week, for a period of 5 weeks. ROM and sEMG were analyzed at baseline, after the first session, and before and after the last session. sEMG (%RMS) significantly increased in the acute effect of the last session of WBVE (108.00 ± 5.07, p < 0.008, right leg; 106.20 ± 3.53, p < 0.02, left leg) compared to the CG. ROM did not significantly change in TG or CG. In conclusion, 5 weeks of WBVE exerted neuromuscular effects capable of increasing VL muscle RMS in individuals with MetS, this effect being potentially useful in the physical rehabilitation of these individuals.

show abstract

“…Vibratory stimuli are assumed to promote central and/or peripheral adaptations in the neuro‐musculoskeletal system . Through portable vibrators acting directly over tendons or muscle bellies, local vibration (LV) is a significant neuromuscular workload that may affect force‐generating capacity and induce neural changes .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of four local vibratory stimuli on mechanical and sensorial variables related to muscle‐tendon unit response

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is still unclear what is the optimum local vibration stimulus (LV) configuration to generate a greater range of motion gain (ROM) and how LV affects the mechanical and sensory responses of the skeletal muscles. This study aimed to compare the acute effects of four LV configurations on mechanical and sensorial variables related to the muscle‐tendon unit response to stretching. Ten male volunteers were randomly undertaken to four LV configurations (LV1: 14 Hz and 3 mm, LV2: 24 Hz and 3 mm, LV3: 14 Hz and 6 mm, and LV4: 24 Hz and 6 mm) at the right hamstrings muscles, and one non‐vibration condition (control). Maximum ROM (ROMMAX) and torque (TORMAX), and their respective values at the first sensation of tightness (FSTROM and FSTTOR) during stretching maneuvers were measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. Passive stiffness (PS) was calculated as the slope of torque vs. angle time‐series. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed differences between the post‐test and pre‐test values (delta) for the ROMMAX and FSTROM between each local vibration condition compared with the control group (P < .05), with no differences among them (P > .05). The four LV configurations were equally able to improve the ROMMAX and FSTROM, being the LV4 the one that produced higher ROMMAX in 40% of the participants.

show abstract

Immediate effects of whole-body vibration on neuromuscular performance of quadriceps and oscillation of the center of pressure: A randomized controlled trial

Cited by 10 publications

References 26 publications

Protocols of balance assessment using baropodometry in healthy individuals - systematic review

Protocols of balance assessment using baropodometry in healthy individuals - systematic review

Evaluation of Whole-Body Vibration Exercise on Neuromuscular Activation Through Electromyographic Pattern of Vastus Lateralis Muscle and on Range of Motion of Knees in Metabolic Syndrome: A Quasi-Randomized Cross-Over Controlled Trial

Comparison of four local vibratory stimuli on mechanical and sensorial variables related to muscle‐tendon unit response

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About