2003
DOI: 10.1097/01823246-200314020-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Exercise Testing to Evaluate Low-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
89
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 In the setting of negative initial biomarker results and a nonischemic ECG result, the 30-day risk profile of ED patients with chest pain is favorable. [7][8][9] Most patients can be risk stratified to a less than 1% chance of adverse event, although no patients can be stratified to zero risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5,6 In the setting of negative initial biomarker results and a nonischemic ECG result, the 30-day risk profile of ED patients with chest pain is favorable. [7][8][9] Most patients can be risk stratified to a less than 1% chance of adverse event, although no patients can be stratified to zero risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However these functional tests are limited in their utilization for early triage due to the inappropriateness of performing them before confirmation of serial negative cardiac biomarkers and by the frequency of non-diagnostic tests. Although they provide additive risk stratification information, their diagnostic accuracy for the detection of obstructive CAD is limited, leading to unnecessary ICAs in 33-44 % of patients with suspected ACS [63,64].…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the lengthy assessment process may yield equivocal results or place the patient at unnecessary risk, by necessitating further invasive investigations such as coronary angiography. A number of studies also have found that EST adds limited diagnostic information beyond clinical data and biomarkers [5], particularly for younger individuals [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Exercise stress testing is the most commonly used modality of provocative testing for a patient with a normal ECG who is not taking digoxin and who is without physical limitations [4]. Numerous studies from the United States have found that a negative exercise stress test (EST) is accurate, safe and cost-effective in excluding ACS in low risk patients [5][6][7]. However, such studies also report low positive predictive values [7] and high rates of indeterminate tests (around 25%) [3,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%