2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.858520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Integration of Coarticulatory Cues for /s/-Retraction in American English

Abstract: Coarticulatory “noise” has long been presumed to benefit the speaker at the expense of the listener. However, recent work has found that listeners make use of that variation in real time to aid speech processing, immediately integrating coarticulatory cues as soon as they become available. Yet sibilants, sounds notable for their high degree of context-dependent variability, have been presumed to be unavailable for immediate integration, requiring that listeners hold all cues in a buffer until all relevant cues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We extracted the second [s] from the first sentence and the [ R ] and [i] from the second sentence. Then, the sibilants were digitally mixed together using a modified script in PRAAT used in Phillips, 20 creating a continuum from 0% [ R ] to 100% [ R ] at intervals of 10% (producing 11 sibilants) for each of the three voices. COGs (in Hz) for each step of the continuum for each vocal tract are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Stimuli Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted the second [s] from the first sentence and the [ R ] and [i] from the second sentence. Then, the sibilants were digitally mixed together using a modified script in PRAAT used in Phillips, 20 creating a continuum from 0% [ R ] to 100% [ R ] at intervals of 10% (producing 11 sibilants) for each of the three voices. COGs (in Hz) for each step of the continuum for each vocal tract are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Stimuli Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-averaged COG frequencies were measured from the middle 80% of each sibilant using a Praat script (DiCanio 2013) set to a 10 millisecond measurement window. COG was selected as the acoustic variable because it has been measured in previous phonetic studies of Dene sibilants (Gordon et al 2002, McDonough 2003 and sibilant harmony (Berkson 2013), and studies of other languages support its utility as an acoustic correlate for sibilant anteriority (Zellou 2013, Phillips 2020). Significantly higher COG means are expected for the fronter [+anterior] /s/ than for [−anterior] /S/.…”
Section: Acoustic Measurements and Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%