2002
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200204000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Loading of Osseotite Implants: Two-Year Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
47
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…placing a full occlusal load onto the implant via the prosthesis, within 72 hours after placement). [8][9][10][11][12][13] The advantages of immediately loading implants are clear: they allow for shorter treatment times and allow for immediate restoration of function and esthetics. These advantages, however, may be offset by an increased risk of implant failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…placing a full occlusal load onto the implant via the prosthesis, within 72 hours after placement). [8][9][10][11][12][13] The advantages of immediately loading implants are clear: they allow for shorter treatment times and allow for immediate restoration of function and esthetics. These advantages, however, may be offset by an increased risk of implant failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a method described by Tames et al, 20 patient driven. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The initial reports on immediate loading of mandibular implants used extra or expendable implants that were placed into function with a temporary fixed restoration at surgery. [4][5][6][7] A clinician's decision about whether to rehabilitate an edentulous patient or a patient who requires that all of his or her teeth be removed immediately is made based on evidence that this method is as successful as traditional delayed techniques.…”
Section: Immediate Loading Of the Edentulous Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1-1 summarizes classic papers on the immediate loading of mandibular implants; these reports verify that sufficient evidence exists that this procedure is acceptable and no longer should be considered experimental. 5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The reasons cited for implant failure in immediate loading of the edentulous mandible include placement of short implants into the posterior mandible, bruxism, poorly fitting prostheses, poor surgical technique, and infection of the implants. The success rates ranged from 84.7% to 100%, indicating that immediate loading of the edentulous mandible is a viable treatment.…”
Section: Immediate Loading Of the Edentulous Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brånemark et al recommended a stress-free unloaded healing period in order to minimize the risk of implant failure [1,2]. However, to achieve the targeted success rate, a strict protocol needs to be followed even if patients encounter pain with prolonged use of uncomfortable interim prostheses [2][3][4]. Recently, researchers have begun to focus attention on intermediate loading at the post-surgery stage, as well as the parameters for gauging successful loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%