1972
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90820-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate postabortal intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: A double-blind study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, immediate insertion can be safely performed after suction curettage for incomplete abortion, many of which are the results of illegal abortion. 11,35 Because the vast majority of providers of surgical abortion and postabortal care are skilled providers of IUDs, no additional training would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, immediate insertion can be safely performed after suction curettage for incomplete abortion, many of which are the results of illegal abortion. 11,35 Because the vast majority of providers of surgical abortion and postabortal care are skilled providers of IUDs, no additional training would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in which an IUD was inserted immediately after completion of an elective first trimester abortion indicate that there is no apparent increased risk for those accepting an IUD than for those who do not (9). Goldsmith and his co-workers reported no significant differences in postoperative complications between women who accepted or did not accept IUDs immediately after undergoing an illegal or spontaneous abortion (4). No information concerning rehospitalization was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted with different kinds of IUDs inserted immediately after an abortion have shown that the postabortion period is a favorable time for IUD insertion (1,4,5). However, postabortion experiences may be varied, depending upon the in-dividual IUD design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found 12 such trials, but excluded one due to alternate rather than random assignment 2 and one due to lack of our main outcomes 3 . We excluded two studies 4,5 due to unethical practice. In each, the researchers performed sham IUCD insertions during which the women believed they received an IUCD and were protected against pregnancy, but one was not inserted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each, the researchers performed sham IUCD insertions during which the women believed they received an IUCD and were protected against pregnancy, but one was not inserted. Additionally, these two studies had design flaws that would have disqualified them; one reported only bleeding and pain outcomes at one month 5 and the other reported outcomes at six months but did not provide data on person‐time exposure or loss to follow up 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%