2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate versus delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background: The study was conducted to compare 6-month usage of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) when placed immediately or 3 to 6 weeks after dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure. Study Design: We enrolled women undergoing D&E at 15 to 23 weeks of gestation. After completion of the D&E, subjects without contraindications to immediate IUD insertion were randomized to immediate or delayed (3 to 6 weeks later) LNG-IUD insertion. Subjects in the immediate group had the LNG-IUD placed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Baseline characteristics of those lost to follow-up differed by race, with Asians least likely to be lost and White women most likely to be lost. Other studies of contraceptive use in diverse, urban settings, including one in our own institution, have not reported differences in loss to follow-up by race/ethnicity [1,16,18,19]. While we cannot explain this finding, it did not differ by study arms, making an effect on our main results unlikely.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baseline characteristics of those lost to follow-up differed by race, with Asians least likely to be lost and White women most likely to be lost. Other studies of contraceptive use in diverse, urban settings, including one in our own institution, have not reported differences in loss to follow-up by race/ethnicity [1,16,18,19]. While we cannot explain this finding, it did not differ by study arms, making an effect on our main results unlikely.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Studies of contraception in the postabortion setting in other institutions have had similar LTFU rates, such as 40% at 6 months in a study of women receiving IUDs after abortion and 46% at 6 weeks in another postabortion IUD study [16,17]. Baseline characteristics of those lost to follow-up differed by race, with Asians least likely to be lost and White women most likely to be lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this same retrospective analysis, the risk of IUD expulsion associated with second-trimester abortion was significantly higher than the risk associated with first-trimester abortion (7.0% vs. 1.6%, p=.02) [76]. In a small randomized controlled trial, 88 women undergoing second-trimester dilation and evacuation had an LNG-IUD expulsion rate of 6.8% after immediate postabortion insertion; this was not statistically significantly different from the 5.0% expulsion rate following delayed IUD insertion experienced by women in the same study [77]. Prospective studies of immediate postabortion IUD insertion suggest a trend toward greater risk of expulsion with increasing gestational age, although the differences were not statistically significant: 0.8%-2.0% after first-trimester abortion and 3%-7% after second-trimester abortion [78,79].…”
Section: Expulsionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The continuation rate with IUD following immediate insertion at the time of surgical TOP has varied in randomised controlled trials: between 81–92% at 6 months and 68–71% at 1 year . In prospective cohort studies the proportions have been 78–82% at 6 months .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%