2018
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate versus delayed reconstruction of head and neck cutaneous melanoma

Abstract: 3a. Laryngoscope, 2566-2572, 2018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is the largest to date reporting the incidence and risk factors for positive margins after surgical treatment of CMHN. Given the overall low incidence of positive margins (5%) in this study and others, immediate reconstruction may very well be a good option for many patients; however, variables such as patient comorbidities, clinicopathologic features, and reconstructive modality must be taken into account 1,10,11 . We recommend considering delayed reconstruction in cases of lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma, desmoplastic melanoma, spindle cell melanoma, and T3 and T4 tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study is the largest to date reporting the incidence and risk factors for positive margins after surgical treatment of CMHN. Given the overall low incidence of positive margins (5%) in this study and others, immediate reconstruction may very well be a good option for many patients; however, variables such as patient comorbidities, clinicopathologic features, and reconstructive modality must be taken into account 1,10,11 . We recommend considering delayed reconstruction in cases of lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma, desmoplastic melanoma, spindle cell melanoma, and T3 and T4 tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Given the overall low incidence of positive margins (5%) in this study and others, immediate reconstruction may very well be a good option for many patients; however, variables such as patient comorbidities, clinicopathologic features, and reconstructive modality must be taken into account. 1,10,11 We recommend considering delayed reconstruction in cases of lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma, desmoplastic melanoma, spindle cell melanoma, and T3 and T4 tumors. Patients with T4 tumors have a high likelihood ( P < .001; OR, 3.730; 95% CI, 2.677-5.197) of positive margins ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple recent studies have made blanket conclusions that immediate reconstruction is "oncologically sound" and "safe" following excision with appropriate margins based on depth for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. [2][3][4] The only oncological reason to delay reconstruction is to await final pathological interpretation of the margin status of the definitive excision specimen so that reexcision of positive margins could be performed more precisely without compromising the reconstruction. Excision with appropriate margins based on depth and histological subtype, with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy, remains the most frequently recommended modality of treatment by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La reconstruction peut être réalisée immédiatement lors de la reprise des marges 19 . La chirurgie reconstructive de la face en oncologie est un challenge fonctionnel et esthétique.…”
Section: Technique De Reconstructionunclassified