2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediately loaded non-submerged versus delayed loaded submerged dental implants: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, implants were loaded approximately 3 months after placement using the one‐stage surgical protocol, which may have affected the amount of CBL. The effect of single stage implant placement versus submerged healing has been previously investigated, showing comparable clinical and radiographic results . However, peri‐implant CBL has been demonstrated by others to be significantly higher in the submerged healing group .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, implants were loaded approximately 3 months after placement using the one‐stage surgical protocol, which may have affected the amount of CBL. The effect of single stage implant placement versus submerged healing has been previously investigated, showing comparable clinical and radiographic results . However, peri‐implant CBL has been demonstrated by others to be significantly higher in the submerged healing group .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The I 2 statistic was used to analyse the variations in terms of heterogeneity; in which I 2 values above 75% (range: 0‐100) indicate high heterogeneity. Furthermore, as the meta‐analysis showed high heterogeneity a random‐effect model was adopted, whereas the fixed‐effects model was used when meta‐analysis showed low heterogeneity . The Reviewer Manager v 5.3 software program (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) was used for the meta‐analysis and creation of the forest and funnel plots, with a P value <.05 considered as indicative of statistical significance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, studies have shown that immediately loaded implants have excellent success rates . Evidence suggests immediate loading does not negatively affect osteointegration . A review of histological studies found that immediate loading did not impede osseointegration when kept below a micromotion threshold .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%