2016
DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2016.1249875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immersion education outcomes and the Gaelic community: identities and language ideologies among Gaelic medium-educated adults in Scotland

Abstract: There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To appreciate the social reality of essentialist perspectives in various communities' conception of language and identity does not necessarily mean assuming such a perspective in one's own theoretical approach (Bucholtz & Hall 2004). Indeed, Dorian Scotland (see Dunmore 2017Dunmore , 2018bDunmore , 2019.…”
Section: Discussion: Gaels and Gaelic In 21st Century Scotland And Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To appreciate the social reality of essentialist perspectives in various communities' conception of language and identity does not necessarily mean assuming such a perspective in one's own theoretical approach (Bucholtz & Hall 2004). Indeed, Dorian Scotland (see Dunmore 2017Dunmore , 2018bDunmore , 2019.…”
Section: Discussion: Gaels and Gaelic In 21st Century Scotland And Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 82. As discussed elsewhere (Dunmore 2017(Dunmore , 2019, Scottish new speakers' identifications with the Gaelic language varied widely, but were never described in terms analogous to the 'Xians-with-Xish' ideal emphasised in Fishman's (1991Fishman's ( , 2001b at the most minute level of analysis, the speech act (Hymes 1974:52). By focusing on these three levels of analysis, Hymes emphasised that language ought not to be separated from how and why it is used in practice.…”
Section: Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"New speakers" (Hornsby 2015; Jaffe 2015) are children or adults who acquire "a socially and communicatively consequential level of competence and practice" (Jaffe 2015, p. 25). In addition, numerous studies have traced partially precarious identity constructions as a specific feature of this group (Dunmore 2016;Puigdevall et al 2018), which can be summarized as "deviant identities". This positioning is, in turn, the result of specific communicative experiences, such as the non-acceptance of their use of language by so-called native speakers (Hornsby 2015), numerous corrections (Arendt 2012) and an ambivalent relationship to belonging, authorities and authenticities (O'Rourke 2015; Bermingham and Higham 2018; Fhlannchadha and Hickey 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation Of Language Attitudes Small Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…] Objects of knowledge acquisition are thus procedural knowledge of use as well as declarative knowledge of the language. Together with the above-mentioned atmosphere of social closeness, the shelter, the cooperative group structure oriented towards egalitarian peers; the independent development of learning objects and acquisition practiced through immersive use, the network exhibits central characteristics of functional learning space, as current language didactic studies on the teaching of languages and minorities show (Sato and Ballinger 2016;Deweale et al 2017;Dunmore 2016;Wind Eskildsen and Majlesi 2018). Tolerant attitudes towards language use as well as the evaluatively positive appreciation of Low German form an important basis for this.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…O' Hanlon 2015 for a history of Gaelic education). Dunmore (2017) notes that the Scottish Government and Bòrd na Gàidhlig (the national public body responsible for the promotion of the language) both align growth in GME with attempts to halt the decline in numbers of Gaelic speakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%