Immersive Digital Heritage Experience with the Use of Interactive Technology

Ιωαννίδης, Μαρίνος; Athanasiou, Vasilis; Chatzigrigoriou, Pavlos; Papageorgiou, Eirini; Leventis, Georgios; Nikolakopoulou, Vasiliki; Sovis, Christian

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48974-2_30

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Head-mounted display (HMD) are portable immersive systems offering promising opportunities to improve the user experience and interaction in CH field (Ferrari, 2017). Ioannides (2016) developed an interactive book providing an immersive digital heritage experience.…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Innovative Xr Systems in Cultural Heritage. A Case Study

Carrozzino

Voinea

Duguleană

et al. 2019

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The technological advances made in the recent years in the field of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have led to a revolution in many adjacent areas. One of these is Cultural Heritage (CH), as the new array of XR technologies (a concept integrating Augmented, Mixed and Virtual Reality) is offering new interaction possibilities. The purpose of this paper is to compare several such technologies at application level, and to classify them based on common features such as Interaction, Manipulability, Ease of Use and others. The study presented in this paper was carried out during the H2020 project eHERITAGE ('Expanding the Research and Innovation Capacity in Cultural Heritage Virtual Reality Applications'). The action had as output multiple XR systems/applications. We compare 4 of them: a smartphone-based AR application, a digital book with 3D elements deployed on a large touchscreen, a large holographic display and a bow simulator built using a VR headset and a mechatronic system. We evaluate these innovative systems in the context of the 2 educational events, when over 4000 participants interacted with our team. Results show that systems with greater interaction and immersion features were preferred over the others. Furthermore, Mixed Reality was preferred over Virtual and Augmented Reality.

show abstract

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Innovative Xr Systems in Cultural Heritage. A Case Study

Carrozzino

Voinea

Duguleană

et al. 2019

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At an international level, the bibliographic review promotes theoretical research [16][17][18][19]. There are some few scientific papers related to the evaluation of cultural heritage [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], but most of them pinpoint tangible cultural assets. Regarding the study and the evaluation of intangible cultural heritage, the literature shows that researchers have mainly focused on linking intangible cultural heritage with new technologies (Geographical systems, 3d scanner etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recording and Evaluating the Tangible and Intangible Cultural Assets of a Place through a Multicriteria Decision-Making System

Linaki

Serraos

2020

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The starting point of this paper is the fact that multicriteria decision-making systems have not had the greatest impact on cultural studies, and few researchers have addressed this problem. The paper focuses on the analysis of the main object of an ongoing Doctoral thesis. More specifically, it examines the proposal of a new multicriteria evaluation based on a decision-making method. The paper intends to relate culture with multicriteria decision-making methods. This systematic review provides the direct analysis and assessment of the existing bibliographic references, and addresses a gap of knowledge in the intangible research field, identifying trends in the broader cultural heritage sector. The two basic principles of the paper are the recording and the evaluation of the cultural significance of the intangible and tangible heritage assets of a place. More specifically, the paper seeks to address a new scientific tool that initially records and—in the process—evaluates, using quantitative and qualitative criteria, specific cultural assets. Moreover, the paper outlines a new approach to the calibration—from optimal to worse—of the heritage of a place according to its significance. The purpose of the record and the evaluation is to create a ranking list of the most culturally significant tangible and intangible asset of places, in order to manage them. The design of the multicriteria method is based on a system that can be constantly updated diachronically, and can be fulfilled with new cultural assets and then re-evaluated. The explanation of the system is given through a step-by-step guide to the data analysis process, ensuring that the system has elements that are easy to access, to understand, and to use by each state actor (institution, individual, company, etc.).

show abstract

Digital Transformation Strategy Initiative in Cultural Heritage: The Case of Tate Museum

Kamariotou

Kitsios

2021

Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Immersive Digital Heritage Experience with the Use of Interactive Technology

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Comparing Innovative Xr Systems in Cultural Heritage. A Case Study

Comparing Innovative Xr Systems in Cultural Heritage. A Case Study

Recording and Evaluating the Tangible and Intangible Cultural Assets of a Place through a Multicriteria Decision-Making System

Digital Transformation Strategy Initiative in Cultural Heritage: The Case of Tate Museum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About