2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigration and the American industrial revolution from 1880 to 1920

Abstract: In this study, we measure the contribution of immigrants and their descendents to the growth and industrial transformation of the American workforce in the age of mass immigration from 1880 to 1920. The size and selectivity of the immigrant community, as well as their disproportionate residence in large cities, meant they were the mainstay of the American industrial workforce. Immigrants and their children comprised over half of manufacturing workers in 1920, and if the third generation (the grandchildren of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with historical accounts of immigrants bringing raw labor and manufacturing know-how, both of which were crucial for the growth of manufacturing during this time (Hirschman and Mogford, 2009).…”
Section: Migrationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are consistent with historical accounts of immigrants bringing raw labor and manufacturing know-how, both of which were crucial for the growth of manufacturing during this time (Hirschman and Mogford, 2009).…”
Section: Migrationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Industrialization: Based on various accounts of the historical effects of immigration, a potential explanation for the long-run economic benefits of immigration is that, during the early stages of industrial development, immigration provided a large supply of labor that was necessary for the take-off of industry and sustained modern economic growth (Goldin, 1994, Hatton and Williamson, 1998, Hirschman and Mogford, 2009. Several historians have documented that immigrants were disproportionately represented in the industrial workforce (Engerman andSokoloff, 2000, Alexander, 2007).…”
Section: Evidence From Short-run Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, employers preferred hiring newcomers since ethnic competition reduces worker solidarity and prevailing wage standards (Hatton and Williamson 1998;Lichtenstein 2002; but see Carter and Sutch 1998;Hirschman and Mogford 2009). Consequently, native-born unionists in the American Federation of Labor (AFL) and other antiforeigner groups organized and lobbied at the federal level successfully to restrict future immigration flows (Tichenor 2002).…”
Section: Immigrants Manufacturing and Upward Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La ventaja de estas grandes industrias fue su economía de escala, que con la producción en masa por un lado, el aprovechamiento de la energía eléctrica y de las redes de ferrocarriles expandidos por todo el país, por otro, se vieron en la necesidad de contratar cada vez más personal, y este personal lo proveía el sector agrícola. Un indicador del cambio de la estructura laboral fue que en 1880 eran 2,5 millones de trabajadores en el sector industrial, mientras que en 1920 ascendían a 10 millones, urbanizándose la población, porque las fábricas y oficinas se concentraban en las ciudades (Hirschman y Mogford, 2009). …”
Section: Migración Rural En Norteaméricaunclassified