2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3434292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigration vs. Poverty: Causal Impact on Demand for Redistribution in a Survey Experiment

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuziemko et al (2015[36]) show that providing information about policy effectiveness increases the effect of the informational treatment on redistributive preferences. Lergetporer, Werner and Woessmann (2020 [37]) confirm the result, thought they show that the information on effectiveness does not increase the effect of providing inequality information but rather works as a separate channel. Settele (2021 [39]) shows that giving people the facts about the wide gender wage gap has only a limited impact on demand for concrete policies to reduce that gap, because a sizeable share of respondents believe that such policies are ineffective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Kuziemko et al (2015[36]) show that providing information about policy effectiveness increases the effect of the informational treatment on redistributive preferences. Lergetporer, Werner and Woessmann (2020 [37]) confirm the result, thought they show that the information on effectiveness does not increase the effect of providing inequality information but rather works as a separate channel. Settele (2021 [39]) shows that giving people the facts about the wide gender wage gap has only a limited impact on demand for concrete policies to reduce that gap, because a sizeable share of respondents believe that such policies are ineffective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Introduction Immigration occupies a central and controversial position in the current socio-political and cultural debate (Alesina et al, 2018;Martinangeli and Windsteiger, 2019;Romarri, 2019;Guriev and Papaioannou, 2020). Despite immigrant populations contributing significantly to the growth of local economies and providing labour force to sectors with relatively scarce native offer, political parties and platforms endorsing anti-immigration positions have been ubiquitously on the rise (Turner and Cross, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Nevertheless, not all the experimental evidence agrees. Lergetporer, Werner and Woessmann (2020 [37]), studying the impact of educational inequalities, also provide some of the treated participants with information linking the proposed policies with educational inequalities. They find that this additional "connecting" information does not rise the effect.…”
Section: Possible Explanations For the Limited Effect Of Information On Redistributive Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a different experiment in which they prime respondents to be less confident in government, they also show that reducing trust has an independent negative effect on demand for redistribution. Conversely, Lergetporer, Werner and Woessmann (2020 [37]) argue that reduced trust does not explain the limited effect of the inequality information treatment on preferences for redistribution, because the effect is driven by those groups that trust the government less.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation