1997
DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:19970976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMMJPDA versus MHT and Kalman filter with NN correlation: performance comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers proposed filtering algorithm, such as α−β filter, α−β−γ filter, least square algorithm, extended Kalman filter, and particle filter (Yoo and Kim, 2003;He et al, 2015;De Feo et al, 1997). These algorithms are only practical in the open sea, because assumptions on the status of real moving vessels have to be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers proposed filtering algorithm, such as α−β filter, α−β−γ filter, least square algorithm, extended Kalman filter, and particle filter (Yoo and Kim, 2003;He et al, 2015;De Feo et al, 1997). These algorithms are only practical in the open sea, because assumptions on the status of real moving vessels have to be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods have various shortcomings. For example, the low track maintenance of the nearest neighbor association method, and the typical track switching behavior of the Joint Probabilistic Data Association method are not acceptable, see [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al (2015) designed the IMM-UKF-UPF algorithm which combines the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) algorithm with the Unscented Particle Filter (UPF) algorithm to reduce the influence of flicker noises for ground-based radar. De Feo et al (1997) compared MHT and IMM-JPDA with Kalman filtering in radar tracking. However, assumptions on the status of objects and noises have to be made in all the filtering algorithms.…”
Section: Filtering and Classification Methods On Radar Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%