Anime studies is still a young research field, arguably shaped by the indisciplinarity of a scholarship informed by Japanese Studies, Communication and Media approaches or Comic Book Studies. Drawing on an increased general interest in anime, Northrop Davis's Manga and Anime Go to Hollywood, with its direct and informative style, its visual layout and colour illustrations, is written to appeal to an audience outside of any single specialized academic area. Davis succeeds in introducing other media in his description of Japanese popular culture, mainly TV dramas (doramas) and special-effects cinema (tokusatsu) but also other traditional forms with a historical relevance, such as early scrolls, woodblock printing, kamishibai (paper theatre) and takarazuka performances. It is understandable that he addresses only the most 'popular' within the popular Japanese culture: in the vast universe of references, signs and meanings that is global popular culture, it is impossible to cover everything. In general terms, the text is a pleasant and well-documented read, although students and academics of manga and anime may miss a greater depth on the subject. With regard to the structure of the book, the text is not always organized coherently and there is a certain degree of redundancy. The book is constructed around the definition of manga and anime languages and narratives and their adaptation to American cinema. From the beginning, Davis introduces the metaphor of hybridization and the existence of a 'DNA' in cultural products. The metaphor guides the description of manga and anime's external features and articulates the entire text. The chosen metaphor is valid but perhaps limited in scope. Hybridization, as shown by transnational studies, may correspond to different models of globalization, regionalization and localization (Iwabuchi, 2000). In this sense, Davis mentions numerous examples of localization of Japanese products released in the US and implies that the big Hollywood blockbusters are a local phenomenon (American). Because of this, he does not discuss the globalization of manga and anime (i.e. other local non-American adaptations). He does not show interest either in regionalization or the existence of other relevant areas of influence, such as East Asian markets. Perhaps the greatest contribution to this discourse around hybridization is not the evidence based on the analysis of the texts but rather the access to sources of special interest, including interviews with academics (mainly American ones), producers and distributors of both markets. These interviews (some conducted by the author himself) are 799406A NM0010.1177/1746847718799406AnimationBook reviews book-review2018 Book reviews