“…Notably, people's forced physical immobility has already been explored in previous studies, suggesting how immobility regimes (Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013), including policies and legislation (Turner, 2007), a brokerage system (Xiang and Lindquist, 2014), and surveillance technologies (Shamir, 2005) create conditions of physical immobility for certain bodies, such as refugees (Patterson and Leurs, 2020; Smets, 2019; Witteborn, 2011) and migrants (Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013; Lin et al, 2017). In the context of media and communications, an emerging body of work has begun exploring how both movements and stillness are generated through everyday, digital, and care practices, as shaped by social relations, power dynamics, and digital infrastructures (Cabalquinto, 2022; Leurs, 2014; Seuferling, 2021; Smets, 2019). This paper therefore contributes to these works by unravelling the scales and textures of both mobilities and immobilities through ageing migrants’ digital practices during a lockdown.…”