2021
DOI: 10.24241/rcai.2021.129.3.7/en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobile, stranded and excluded: the effects of COVID-19 on the international asylum system

Abstract: Disruptions to patterns of international mobility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have affected refugees particularly severely. This article analyses the impact of the health crisis on international protection, particularly its effects on specific phases of the process: access to the territory, access to the procedure, and reception and its conditions. Using comparative analysis that incorporates the dynamics observed in different geographies, the article takes an in-depth look at the pandemic’s effects on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This applied both to the 2016 proposals and to those made from 2020 onwards, resulting from the uncertain post-pandemic scenarios that have led to negotiations being postponed. Particularly, due to health crisis effects on specific phases of the process: access to the territory, access to the procedure, and reception and its conditions (Garcés-Mascareñas & López-Sala, 2021). These legal reforms could be desirable alternatives to change, but their viability and achievability (Wright, 2007) have not escaped the potential dichotomy between utopia and dystopia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applied both to the 2016 proposals and to those made from 2020 onwards, resulting from the uncertain post-pandemic scenarios that have led to negotiations being postponed. Particularly, due to health crisis effects on specific phases of the process: access to the territory, access to the procedure, and reception and its conditions (Garcés-Mascareñas & López-Sala, 2021). These legal reforms could be desirable alternatives to change, but their viability and achievability (Wright, 2007) have not escaped the potential dichotomy between utopia and dystopia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%