2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization and remineralization of N following addition of wheat straw into soil: determination of gross N transformation rates by 15N-ammonium isotope dilution technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the individual sources, rice straw produced negative agronomic efficiency over control treatment. Incorporation of rice straw into soil can be enhanced through microbial N immobilization due to its high C:N ratio (Shindo and Nishio 2005). Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) as affected by various organic and amendment and their combination are presented in differences were observed in N-use efficiency, and maximum NUE was observed in the treatment where 50% RS + G was applied followed by the treatment where 50% CD + G was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the individual sources, rice straw produced negative agronomic efficiency over control treatment. Incorporation of rice straw into soil can be enhanced through microbial N immobilization due to its high C:N ratio (Shindo and Nishio 2005). Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) as affected by various organic and amendment and their combination are presented in differences were observed in N-use efficiency, and maximum NUE was observed in the treatment where 50% RS + G was applied followed by the treatment where 50% CD + G was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That was because more condensed or substituted aromatic rings and N-containing materials emerged in the microbial residue, however a low proportion of O-alkyl and carboxylic acid functional groups was reserved. The gradual decrease of C/N ratio and slight increase of H/C and O/C ratios of the residue treated by P were explained that the amounts of N-containing (Large amounts of inorganic N were transferred into organic N components (Shindo and Nishio, 2005)) and aliphatic compounds, O-containing groups were enhanced gradually cellulose. Furthermore, comparing with the referenced humic fractions (SRHA and SRFA standards), all the microbial residues originating from cellulose had more amounts of O-containing groups and N-containing compounds, whereas their molecules were not polymerized the degree of real HS.…”
Section: Compositions Of Microbial Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was so easy to understand that a part of inorganic N in the culture fluid could be assimilated into the microbial biomass, indirectly enhancing the amount of N-containing materials in its residue (Shindo and Nishio, 2005). The ability of utilizing inorganic N and synthesizing its own components of An in the fluid, by contrast, was the least.…”
Section: Compositions Of Microbial Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Other studies have also shown that the increases in the biomass N were considerably lower than the N immobilized after the addition of glucose (e.g., Bremer and van Kessel 1990) and other organic materials (e.g., Shindo and Nishio 2005). Our study showed that the recoveries of the immobilized N in the biomass N during 7-day incubation (i.e., the ratio of ΔBio-N to ΔExt-N) differed widely (16-90%), although other studies have shown that the increased biomass N accounted for relatively narrow ranges, such as 31-53% in Chinese arable soils (Liang et al 2012) and 50-66% in Pakistan arable soil (Rasul et al 2009) of the immobilized N. This would be because a wide range of soils with quite different properties, including upland, paddy and forest soils, were used in this study (Table 1).…”
Section: Net Increases In Microbial Biomass N and Microbial N Immobilmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has often been observed that the increase in biomass N measured by the FE method can explain only the small fraction of microbial immobilized N after the addition of glucose (Azam et al 1989;Bremer and van Kessel 1990;Blagodatsky and Yevdokimov 1998;Vinten et al 2002;Qiu et al 2007;Rasul et al 2009;Liang et al 2012) and other organic materials (Vinten et al 2002;Shindo and Nishio 2005;Tilston et al 2009). In addition, the soils used in the previous studies evaluating both microbial N immobilization and the increases in biomass N due to glucose addition were mostly collected from arable sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%