2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of catalase onto Eupergit C and its characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the immobilised laccase (2.75 ± 0.05 l/lmol min), based on the ratio between the turnover number and the Michaelis constant (k cat /K M ), was approximately twice as low as that of the free enzyme (6.01 ± 0.40 l/lmol min). Lower efficiencies for immobilised laccase and catalase from Lentinus edodes on Eupergit C were also reported by D'Annibale et al (2000) and Alptekin et al (2010), respectively. Several authors have suggested that this effect could be related to diffusion substrate limitations, substrate partitioning, lower accessibility of the substrate to the active site, protein conformational changes, internal mass transport constraint and/or substrate/product adsorption onto the carrier surface (Davis and Burns 1992;Hernaiz and Crout 2000;Rekuc et al 2010;Yamak et al 2009).…”
Section: Determination Of Apparent Kinetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency of the immobilised laccase (2.75 ± 0.05 l/lmol min), based on the ratio between the turnover number and the Michaelis constant (k cat /K M ), was approximately twice as low as that of the free enzyme (6.01 ± 0.40 l/lmol min). Lower efficiencies for immobilised laccase and catalase from Lentinus edodes on Eupergit C were also reported by D'Annibale et al (2000) and Alptekin et al (2010), respectively. Several authors have suggested that this effect could be related to diffusion substrate limitations, substrate partitioning, lower accessibility of the substrate to the active site, protein conformational changes, internal mass transport constraint and/or substrate/product adsorption onto the carrier surface (Davis and Burns 1992;Hernaiz and Crout 2000;Rekuc et al 2010;Yamak et al 2009).…”
Section: Determination Of Apparent Kinetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For example, free laccase was completely inactivated after 1 h of incubation at pH 2, and retained only 15% of initial activity at pH 4. However, the residual activity of immobilised laccase after 1 h amounted to 70 and 80% at pH 2 and 4, respectively, and 10 and 30% of the initial activity after 24 h. Alptekin et al (2010) reported that the multiplecovalent bonding of laccase to the resin resulting in more rigid enzyme less prone to pH-induced a The amount of immobilised protein was calculated from the difference between the protein in the control and protein remaining in the supernatant of immobilised assay b Assay conditions: 5 mM ABTS, 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 5, 20 mg/ml biocatalyst, in a final volume of 3 ml. Measured with immobilised biocatalyst over 10 min period c Activity recovered was calculated as the ratio of measured activity to theoretic bound activity (difference between the laccase activity in the controls and the remaining in the supernatant of immobilised assay) conformational changes, that could cause higher pHstability.…”
Section: Optimum Ph and Ph Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, the optimum immobilization time and temperature for catalase were reported as 24 h and 5 1C [33][34]. Based on these results, in this study, the SOD and CAT enzyme immobilizations were carried out at 4 1C and physiological pH of 7.4 within 24 h by varying the initial enzyme and PEI concentrations.…”
Section: Optimization Conditions For Sod/cat Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the second step, a covalent reaction occurs between the adsorbed enzyme and neighboring epoxide groups. 9 The support epoxy groups can react with the amino, sulfhydryl, and hydroxyl groups of the enzyme, forming extremely stable O-C and N-C bonds. 10 Immobilized enzymes can be recovered after a batch, guaranteeing their reutilization in further batches and significantly reducing their costs.…”
Section: Eupergitmentioning
confidence: 99%