“…In general, proteins and enzymes can be immobilized onto solid supports using various techniques, ,, such as (a) “multipoint” covalent bonding via click chemistry − or coupling reactions, yielding amide − or imine bonds, − (b) cross-linking, (c) affinity immobilization, , (d) entrapment, , and (e) adsorption. ,,, Depending on the immobilization technique, the immobilization can enhance the properties of enzymes in terms of thermal stability, tolerance to extreme pH, and organic solvents . Therefore, immobilized enzymes can appear to have higher activities than native enzymes under drastic conditions due to the enhanced stability. ,− On the other hand, the apparent activity of conventional immobilized enzymes can also be lower than that of their native counterparts, mainly because of the hindered substrate accessing or unfavorable conformational transition of the enzyme on the support. ,− Particularly in the case of colloidal supports, the catalytic performance of the immobilized enzymes also strongly depends on the colloidal stability of the colloidal support. , The catalytic performance of the enzymes immobilized onto NPs can decrease drastically, due to hindered accessibility of the substrates to their active sites, when the NPs are not stable and aggregate or sediment in the reaction media. Hence, to create a functional enzymatically active colloidal system, a robust enzyme immobilization on the NPs as well as a colloidally stable system is required.…”