2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of glucoamylase by adsorption on carbon supports and its application for heterogeneous hydrolysis of dextrin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of GA adsorbed onto B 203 was 171 GA U per gram of support and the expressed activity 34 GA U per gram of support, which was 20% of the total immobilized activity. Immobilization efficiency (20%) was similar to that reported for GA adsorption on synthetic carbon material (Kovalenko and Perminova 2008). Both values (adsorbed and expressed activity) were lower than those attained, at laboratory scale, for tests performed to determine maximal support capacity in which adsorbed GA varied from 226 to 258 GA U per gram of support and expressed activity between 49 and 52 GA U per gram of support (Table 5).…”
Section: Bench-scale Ga Immobilization Onto Chicken Bone Particlessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of GA adsorbed onto B 203 was 171 GA U per gram of support and the expressed activity 34 GA U per gram of support, which was 20% of the total immobilized activity. Immobilization efficiency (20%) was similar to that reported for GA adsorption on synthetic carbon material (Kovalenko and Perminova 2008). Both values (adsorbed and expressed activity) were lower than those attained, at laboratory scale, for tests performed to determine maximal support capacity in which adsorbed GA varied from 226 to 258 GA U per gram of support and expressed activity between 49 and 52 GA U per gram of support (Table 5).…”
Section: Bench-scale Ga Immobilization Onto Chicken Bone Particlessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…3 Effect of adsorption temperature: 20°C (filled diamonds) and 51.5°C (empty squares) on the immobilized activity of GA onto bone (d p , 203 µm) free and immobilized GA followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics; however, adsorption onto bone support increased the K M about nine times (from 0.08 to 0.71 mg soluble starch ml −1 ). Different K M variations ranging from a 10% reduction to a 69% increment were reported for biocatalysts produced by GA adsorption onto active carbon (Rani et al 2000), bone particles of 600-2,000 µm (Schafhauser and Storey 1992b), gelatinized corn starch plus subsequent trapping in alginate fibers (Tanriseven et al 2002), and synthetic carbon material Sibunit® (Kovalenko and Perminova 2008). The K M increment determined in this study could be due to changes in GA three-dimensional conformation produced by immobilization and to the limited access of the macromolecular substrate (maltodextrin) to the active site of the enzyme (Bahar and Çelebi 1998;Brena 1996;Trevan 1980).…”
Section: Properties Of Ga Bone Derivativementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The obtained specific activity of CLEA-D (dextrin) reached a maximum of 102% at a dextrin concentration of 2.0 wt %, which was approximately 27% of the value previously enhanced with 0.5 wt % protection. This can be explained by the fact that immobilization interferes with the enzyme catalytic site or that diffusional problems are generally produced when immobilized enzymes are acting on macromolecular substrates [14]. Dextrin as a substrate can effectively protect active sites or maintain the enzyme in a catalytically active conformation.…”
Section: Protecting Agents Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a large variety of matrixes have been used in immobilized glucoamylase [7,[12][13][14]. The enzymes are linked to an insoluble matrix by chemical bonds, which generally produce very stable derivatives in which enzyme leakage is prevented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations for the improvement of the MS analysis include an increased activity of the endoprotease in the presence of carbon as reported previously for other enzymes (49) and/or the prevention of aggregation of adsorbed, partly digested proteins in which the more hydrophobic protein core has been exposed upon endoproteolytic digestion. In a solution, such partly digested particles may be prone to form aggregates due to the (partial) uncovering of hydrophobic residues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%