2008
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2007.0220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of Micro-Organism on Macroporous Polyurethane Carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22] Furthermore, the start-up periods of fixed-film wastewater treatment reactors were reduced by inoculating activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants with suspended growth process, attached biofilm reactors or using purchased microorganisms cultured specially for enhancing wastewater treatment in fixed biofilm treatment technologies. [23,24] Similar strategy of seeding filter media with activated sludge has been followed in the present study to develop biofilm on media that was used in a trickling filter for the treatment of municipal wastewater. However, the start-up phase was reduced to 36 h at low and 24 h at mesophilic temperature regimes for achieving effective treatment of wastewater as compared to previously reported bioreactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20][21][22] Furthermore, the start-up periods of fixed-film wastewater treatment reactors were reduced by inoculating activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants with suspended growth process, attached biofilm reactors or using purchased microorganisms cultured specially for enhancing wastewater treatment in fixed biofilm treatment technologies. [23,24] Similar strategy of seeding filter media with activated sludge has been followed in the present study to develop biofilm on media that was used in a trickling filter for the treatment of municipal wastewater. However, the start-up phase was reduced to 36 h at low and 24 h at mesophilic temperature regimes for achieving effective treatment of wastewater as compared to previously reported bioreactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the performance of the reactor at both seasons (winter and summer), physicochemical analysis of the influent to each media (rubber, polystyrene, plastic and stones) and effluent at certain time intervals (12,24,36 and 48 h) was carried out in triplicate. The physicochemical parameters analysed included chemical oxygen demand (COD), BOD 5 , dissolved oxygen (DO), total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS) and electrical conductivity (EC).…”
Section: Physicochemical Analysis Of Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these may suggest that the better structured magnetic Fe 3 O 4 /PUF composite would be guaranteed when the nanoparticles Fe 3 O 4 did not exceed 5.0%. And the resultant PUF composite should have a high opening ratio and large amounts of pores which maybe enhance the convenient mass transfer in the wastewater treatment [29].…”
Section: Xrd Pattern and Magnetic Analysis Of Fe 3 O 4 Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immobilizing microbiota B500 on macro-porous carriers enhances the removal efficiency for contaminants in wastewater (Park et al 2005 ). Iron-oxidizing bacteria immobilized onto polyurethane foam decrease the risk of membrane fouling and increase the efficiency of pollutants’ degradation (Zhou et al 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%