“…Due to cellulose’s high abundance, biodegradability, and biocompatibility, the field of research on its modification has attained greater recognition during the recent decades. , Plant cellulose is predominantly present in nature; however, it possesses several drawbacks such as contamination with lignin, wax, and hemicellulose . On the other hand, bacterial cellulose emphasizes many merits over plant cellulose, such as high purity (free of impurities such as lignin and wax), biocompatibility, water retention capacity, crystallinity, degree of polymerization, surface area, mechanical properties (flexibility and tensile strength), and biodegradability. − Furthermore, bacterial cellulose pellicles can be produced effectively through the fermentation process of a bacterial strain at a low cost in an environmentally friendly manner. , As a consequence of its several merits, it emerged as a promising candidate for various applications through successive surface modifications including both covalent and noncovalent approaches. , Various synthetic methodologies have been executed on either plant cellulose or bacterial cellulose, which included silylation, acylations, aminylation, acetylation, carboxymethylation, and incorporation of nanoparticles or polymeric materials to enhance the properties of cellulose. , A generic methodology to apply on the cellulose of different sources is rarely reported.…”