2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma13010146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of Radionuclide 133Cs by Magnesium Silicate Hydrate Cement

Abstract: The radionuclide cesium (Cs) was solidified using magnesium silicate hydrate (M–S–H) cement. The influence of Cs+ on the reaction of the M–S–H gel system was evaluated by measuring the compressive strength and microscopic properties of the solidified body. By testing the impact resistance, leaching resistance and freeze–thaw resistance of the solidified body, the immobilizing ability of Cs+ by the M–S–H cement was analyzed. Results indicate that Cs+ only slightly affects the reaction process of the M–S–H gel s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M-S-H has a similar structure with sepiolite: it has a large specific surface area and there are unique nano-scale pores in molecular structure, and it has the ability to adsorb heavy metals (Ji et al, 2014;Jia et al, 2017b;Jia et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2021). Magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H) phases can be considered as a potential cementitious material for nuclear waste immobilization (Walling et al, 2015) owing to its moderate pH value (varying from ∼9.5 to ∼10.5) and the Radionuclide (Cs, Sr) sorption potential (Li et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M-S-H has a similar structure with sepiolite: it has a large specific surface area and there are unique nano-scale pores in molecular structure, and it has the ability to adsorb heavy metals (Ji et al, 2014;Jia et al, 2017b;Jia et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2021). Magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H) phases can be considered as a potential cementitious material for nuclear waste immobilization (Walling et al, 2015) owing to its moderate pH value (varying from ∼9.5 to ∼10.5) and the Radionuclide (Cs, Sr) sorption potential (Li et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials are not considered to be able to totally replace of OPC-based concretes, nor do they offer a one-size-fits-all solution. The wide range of combinations available, however, allows for the formation of materials with various advanced properties, including resistance to acid and heat [ 6 ], high strength [ 7 ], and radionuclide immobilization [ 8 ]. The sustainability of these materials primarily depends on the local availability of the precursors used, as well as selection of the correct type and dose of alkali activator [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC is the most common type of CMs used in radioactive waste immobilization. ,,, Joseph Aspdin coined this term in 1824 because it resembled Portland stone. The immobilization capacity of the PC concerns both physical and chemical processes. Physically, it can act as a suitable barrier, and chemically, it can act as a selective binder for various radioactive wastes.…”
Section: Types Of Waste Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%