2023
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary

Abstract: BackgroundCancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs.MethodsPatients with C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reasonable to suggest that ICIs could serve as the basal treatment of high PD-L1 expression. However, only a subset of CUP patients may respond to ICIs, considerations integrated with genomic profiling, including TMB and detection of immune or inflammatory biomarkers in the tumors (23). Summary of treatment timeline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reasonable to suggest that ICIs could serve as the basal treatment of high PD-L1 expression. However, only a subset of CUP patients may respond to ICIs, considerations integrated with genomic profiling, including TMB and detection of immune or inflammatory biomarkers in the tumors (23). Summary of treatment timeline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have suggested the use of genomics and transcriptomics to identify the primary origin. Based on the hypothesis that metastatic tumors retain similar molecular spectra to their primary tumors, researchers have developed various molecular diagnostic methods, including gene expression profiling (GEP), gene mutation spectra, and DNA methylation [25][26][27]. Among these, GEP is a crucial technique for tracing CUP origins [28].…”
Section: Molecular Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, NGS performed on 389 CUP samples demonstrated that 22% had at least one or more predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response (tumour mutational load, PDL1-positive or MSI high) [53]. Posner et al [54 ▪ ] calculated an immunotherapy response (IR) score based on the combined expression of genes known to predict immunotherapy response and found this to be a more sensitive predictor of response to immunotherapy than high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb) in a retrospective analysis of 28 patients treated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 29%. A phase 2 basket study evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab in 25 evaluable CUP patients reported an ORR of 20%, with 28% progression free at 27 weeks [55 ▪ ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%