The prognostic impact of tumoral programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in correlation with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was retrospectively assessed in 83 patients with completely resected stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, as PD-L1 is a potent regulator of cancer immunity and NLR is a potential surrogate of immune status. Forty-three patients (51.8%) had tumor with positive PD-L1 expression. There was no significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and NLR. PD-L1-positivity failed to provide a significant prognostic impact (overall survival [OS] rate at 5 years, 53.0% in PD-L1-positive patients versus 70.1% in PD-L1-negative patients; P = 0.117). Among NLRlow (<2.2) patients, however, PD-L1-positivity was significantly correlated with a poor prognosis (OS rate at 5 years, 46.1% versus 86.0%; P = 0.020). In contrast, among NLR-high (≥2.2) patients, PD-L1-positivity provided no prognostic impact (P = 0.680). When NLR status and tumoral PD-L1 status were combined, "NLR-low and PD-L1-negative" was a significant and independent factor to predict a favorable recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.237 [95% confidence interval, 0.083 to 0.674]; P = 0.007) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.260 [0.091 to 0.745]; P = 0.012). These results suggest the prognostic impact of tumoral PD-L1 expression might be influenced by the status of NLR. open Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:1243 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57321-x www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ (NLR), which is easily calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by number of lymphocytes, is a potential surrogate of systemic inflammation. Many clinical studies revealed that high NLR was associated with a poor prognosis in NSCLC 10,11 . Recently, the NLR has merged as an indicator of immune status, as it is associated with the survival benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors [12][13][14] . Here, we examined the prognostic impact of tumoral PD-L1 expression status in correlation with NLR in early-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma.
ResultsDistribution of NLR and cut-off value for prognostic analyses. The NLR value of each case was indicated in Fig. 1. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that NLR provided a significant but modest diagnostic performance to predict death (are under ROC curve [AUC-ROC], 0.643; P = 0.029) ( Fig. 1). Based on the ROC curve, the median value (2.2) was employed as the cut-off value to classify each patient into NLR-high (NLR, 2.2 or higher) or NLR-low (NLR, less than 2.2) patient in further survival analyses (Fig. 1).Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) according to NLR status. The NLR provided a significant but modest prognostic impact for overall survival (OS) (P = 0.042), and its prognostic impact did not reach a statistical significance for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.094) (Fig. 2).
PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score, TPS) in correlation with other patient character-istics. The distribution of TPS was indicated in Fig. 1,...